PRHSX vs. PGHAX
PRHSX (T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund) and PGHAX (Putnam Global Health Care Fund) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PRHSX returned 2.69%/yr vs 6.60%/yr for PGHAX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRHSX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for PGHAX.
Performance
PRHSX vs. PGHAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRHSX achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly lower than PGHAX's -2.88% return.
PRHSX
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- -5.20%
- 6M
- -5.57%
- 1Y
- 17.50%
- 3Y*
- 5.15%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- 9.98%
PGHAX
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- -2.88%
- 6M
- -2.32%
- 1Y
- 14.97%
- 3Y*
- 7.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- —
PRHSX vs. PGHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRHSX T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund | -5.20% | 17.75% | 1.82% | 3.03% | -12.22% | 13.50% | 23.02% |
PGHAX Putnam Global Health Care Fund | -2.88% | 15.58% | 1.69% | 9.48% | -4.39% | 19.99% | 13.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRHSX and PGHAX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between PRHSX and PGHAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRHSX vs. PGHAX — Risk / Return Rank
PRHSX
PGHAX
PRHSX vs. PGHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) and Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PGHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRHSX | PGHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.13 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 1.76 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.68 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 4.26 | -0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRHSX | PGHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.13 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.46 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.59 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
PRHSX vs. PGHAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRHSX drawdown since its inception was -42.96%, which is greater than PGHAX's maximum drawdown of -20.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRHSX and PGHAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRHSX | PGHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.96% | -20.52% | -22.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.81% | -9.68% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.00% | -20.52% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.61% | -20.52% | -7.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.17% | -6.93% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.75% | -5.65% | -3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 3.80% | +0.64% |
Volatility
PRHSX vs. PGHAX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PGHAX) at 3.88%. This indicates that PRHSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRHSX | PGHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 3.88% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | 10.08% | +1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 14.12% | +1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 14.37% | +2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 14.40% | +4.86% |
PRHSX vs. PGHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRHSX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PGHAX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRHSX vs. PGHAX - Dividend Comparison
PRHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.76%, more than PGHAX's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGHAX Putnam Global Health Care Fund | 1.91% | 1.86% | 4.71% | 5.33% | 7.48% | 11.17% | 8.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRHSX T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund | 12.76% | 12.09% | 12.89% | 5.21% | 1.77% | 7.46% | 7.16% | 12.29% | 6.57% | 7.43% | 4.55% | 11.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRHSX and PGHAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRHSX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to PGHAX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRHSX dropped -42.96% vs PGHAX's -20.52%.
PRHSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRHSX and PGHAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer