PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRHSX vs. FPHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRHSX vs. FPHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) and Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio (FPHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRHSX achieves a -3.09% return, which is significantly lower than FPHAX's 6.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PRHSX has underperformed FPHAX with an annualized return of 10.22%, while FPHAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.


PRHSX

1D
-1.75%
1M
2.20%
YTD
-3.09%
6M
-2.56%
1Y
20.64%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
3.12%
10Y*
10.22%

FPHAX

1D
-2.16%
1M
5.20%
YTD
6.75%
6M
8.02%
1Y
39.61%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
13.00%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRHSX vs. FPHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRHSX
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund
-3.09%17.75%1.82%3.03%-12.22%13.50%30.19%37.88%1.08%28.04%
FPHAX
Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio
6.75%30.41%9.39%12.54%0.94%11.79%11.16%31.73%5.41%10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PRHSX and FPHAX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2001

0.84

The correlation between PRHSX and FPHAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRHSX vs. FPHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRHSX
PRHSX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PRHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PRHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FPHAX
FPHAX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FPHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FPHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRHSX vs. FPHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) and Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio (FPHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRHSXFPHAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

2.07

-0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.17

2.89

-0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

4.18

-2.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.93

10.91

-5.98

PRHSX vs. FPHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRHSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the FPHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRHSX and FPHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRHSXFPHAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.07

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.72

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.64

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.54

+0.08

Drawdowns

PRHSX vs. FPHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRHSX drawdown since its inception was -42.96%, which is greater than FPHAX's maximum drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRHSX and FPHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRHSXFPHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.96%

-38.26%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.81%

-10.33%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.00%

-28.82%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.61%

-28.82%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.97%

-28.82%

-0.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-2.78%

-3.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.75%

-9.18%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

3.95%

+0.46%

Volatility

PRHSX vs. FPHAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) is 4.35%, while Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio (FPHAX) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that PRHSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRHSXFPHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

5.35%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.77%

14.12%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.31%

20.18%

-4.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

18.04%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

17.86%

+1.39%

PRHSX vs. FPHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRHSX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FPHAX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRHSX vs. FPHAX - Dividend Comparison

PRHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.48%, more than FPHAX's 5.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPHAX
Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio
5.21%5.68%1.90%8.08%5.18%11.09%8.85%8.33%1.65%1.62%1.07%12.63%
PRHSX
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund
12.48%12.09%12.89%5.21%1.77%7.46%7.16%12.29%6.57%7.43%4.55%11.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRHSX and FPHAX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPHAX has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to PRHSX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRHSX dropped -42.96% vs FPHAX's -38.26%.

FPHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRHSX and FPHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer