PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRHSX vs. FBTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRHSX vs. FBTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund I Class (FBTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRHSX achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly lower than FBTIX's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PRHSX has underperformed FBTIX with an annualized return of 11.23%, while FBTIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.06% annualized return.


PRHSX

1D
-0.35%
1M
-1.27%
6M
9.71%
YTD
8.63%
1Y
33.31%
3Y*
9.96%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
11.23%
ALL TIME*
13.18%

FBTIX

1D
0.67%
1M
0.16%
6M
22.02%
YTD
23.73%
1Y
65.42%
3Y*
26.00%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
13.06%
ALL TIME*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRHSX vs. FBTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRHSX
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund
8.63%17.75%1.82%3.03%-12.22%13.50%30.19%37.88%1.08%28.04%
FBTIX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund I Class
23.73%39.91%5.63%11.02%-7.74%-2.86%32.53%26.11%-3.61%26.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PRHSX and FBTIX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2000

0.89

The correlation between PRHSX and FBTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRHSX vs. FBTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRHSX
PRHSX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PRHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PRHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTIX
FBTIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FBTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRHSX vs. FBTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund I Class (FBTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRHSXFBTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.46

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

7.75

-5.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

20.71

-13.75

PRHSX vs. FBTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRHSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the FBTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRHSX and FBTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRHSX vs. FBTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRHSX drawdown since its inception was -42.96%, smaller than the maximum FBTIX drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRHSX and FBTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRHSXFBTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.96%

-63.45%

+20.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.81%

-8.90%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.00%

-32.80%

+11.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.61%

-36.41%

+8.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.97%

-38.64%

+9.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-2.98%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.71%

-20.50%

+11.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

3.32%

+1.27%

Volatility

PRHSX vs. FBTIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) is 5.14%, while Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund I Class (FBTIX) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that PRHSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRHSXFBTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

6.85%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

17.88%

-4.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.35%

23.46%

-7.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.46%

23.81%

-6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

24.39%

-5.12%

PRHSX vs. FBTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRHSX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTIX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRHSX vs. FBTIX - Dividend Comparison

PRHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.13%, more than FBTIX's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBTIX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund I Class
1.12%1.39%5.69%1.36%0.00%18.74%8.01%6.44%2.35%0.00%0.00%5.23%
PRHSX
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund
11.13%12.09%12.89%5.21%1.77%7.46%7.16%12.29%6.57%7.43%4.55%11.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRHSX and FBTIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTIX has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to PRHSX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRHSX dropped -42.96% vs FBTIX's -63.45%.

FBTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRHSX and FBTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer