PRHIX vs. CGDV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRHIX (T. Rowe Price High Yield Fund Class I) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both funds - PRHIX is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PRHIX returned 8.44%/yr vs 25.14%/yr for CGDV. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRHIX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.

Performance

PRHIX vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price High Yield Fund Class I (PRHIX) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRHIX achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 11.89% return.

PRHIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 1.76%
• 6M: 2.64%
• 1Y: 7.37%
• 3Y*: 8.44%
• 5Y*: 3.60%
• 10Y*: 5.16%

CGDV

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 5.09%
• YTD: 11.89%
• 6M: 12.43%
• 1Y: 30.91%
• 3Y*: 25.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRHIX vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PRHIX T. Rowe Price High Yield Fund Class I	1.76%	8.90%	6.17%	12.55%	-8.07%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	11.89%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	-2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PRHIX and CGDV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022	0.48

The correlation between PRHIX and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PRHIX vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRHIX

PRHIX Risk / Return Rank: 80
PRHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
PRHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PRHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PRHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
PRHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 76
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRHIX vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price High Yield Fund Class I (PRHIX) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRHIX	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.68	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.05	3.69	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.50	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.49	3.18	+0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.81	15.06	+2.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRHIX vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRHIX and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRHIX	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	2.68	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	1.24	-0.22

Drawdowns

PRHIX vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRHIX drawdown since its inception was -22.09%, roughly equal to the maximum CGDV drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRHIX and CGDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRHIX	CGDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.09%	-21.82%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.18%	-9.75%	+7.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.84%	-14.28%	+10.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.55%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.50%	-3.62%	+1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.43%	2.06%	-1.63%

Volatility

PRHIX vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price High Yield Fund Class I (PRHIX) is 0.94%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that PRHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRHIX	CGDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.94%	3.09%	-2.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.41%	9.13%	-6.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.24%	11.59%	-8.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.16%	15.48%	-10.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.53%	15.48%	-9.95%

PRHIX vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRHIX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRHIX vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

PRHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, more than CGDV's 1.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.17%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRHIX T. Rowe Price High Yield Fund Class I	6.79%	6.78%	6.13%	5.33%	4.77%	5.18%	5.31%	5.59%	6.37%	5.62%	6.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRHIX and CGDV in my portfolio?

PRHIX and CGDV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRHIX or CGDV?

CGDV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to PRHIX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRHIX dropped -22.09% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.