PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRHIX vs. FQTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRHIX vs. FQTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price High Yield Fund Class I (PRHIX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRHIX achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly lower than FQTIX's 3.55% return.


PRHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.76%
6M
2.64%
1Y
7.37%
3Y*
8.44%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*
5.16%

FQTIX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.74%
YTD
3.55%
6M
4.18%
1Y
9.55%
3Y*
8.69%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRHIX vs. FQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PRHIX
T. Rowe Price High Yield Fund Class I
1.76%8.90%6.17%12.55%-12.54%5.48%5.11%6.43%
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
3.55%7.51%8.03%13.44%-14.39%8.51%3.68%4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between PRHIX and FQTIX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019

0.71

The correlation between PRHIX and FQTIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRHIX vs. FQTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRHIX
PRHIX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PRHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PRHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FQTIX
FQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRHIX vs. FQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price High Yield Fund Class I (PRHIX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRHIXFQTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.72

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

4.44

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.81

23.37

-5.56

PRHIX vs. FQTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the FQTIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRHIX and FQTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRHIXFQTIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

3.16

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.64

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.60

+0.42

Drawdowns

PRHIX vs. FQTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRHIX drawdown since its inception was -22.09%, smaller than the maximum FQTIX drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRHIX and FQTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRHIXFQTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.09%

-24.62%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.18%

-2.20%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.84%

-6.42%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.53%

-18.81%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.50%

-4.32%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

0.42%

+0.01%

Volatility

PRHIX vs. FQTIX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price High Yield Fund Class I (PRHIX) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) at 0.81%. This indicates that PRHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FQTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRHIXFQTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

0.81%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.41%

2.37%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

3.09%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.16%

5.94%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.53%

7.72%

-2.19%

PRHIX vs. FQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRHIX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRHIX vs. FQTIX - Dividend Comparison

PRHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, which matches FQTIX's 6.84% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
6.84%5.70%7.86%7.64%8.10%7.15%6.89%5.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRHIX
T. Rowe Price High Yield Fund Class I
6.79%6.78%6.13%5.33%4.77%5.18%5.31%5.59%6.37%5.62%6.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRHIX and FQTIX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRHIX has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to FQTIX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRHIX dropped -22.09% vs FQTIX's -24.62%.

FQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRHIX and FQTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer