PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRGSX vs. GSIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRGSX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRGSX achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly higher than GSIFX's 7.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGSX has outperformed GSIFX with an annualized return of 15.78%, while GSIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.68% annualized return.


PRGSX

1D
0.58%
1M
-3.52%
6M
9.47%
YTD
15.19%
1Y
29.75%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
15.78%
ALL TIME*
10.09%

GSIFX

1D
-0.55%
1M
-0.89%
6M
4.37%
YTD
7.23%
1Y
16.68%
3Y*
11.24%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
9.68%
ALL TIME*
5.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRGSX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRGSX
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund
15.19%21.42%16.80%25.70%-28.01%9.81%52.29%35.84%-4.51%32.64%
GSIFX
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A
7.23%25.51%0.33%15.44%-17.69%16.23%22.89%27.68%-14.85%25.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PRGSX and GSIFX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1996

0.81

The correlation between PRGSX and GSIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRGSX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRGSX
PRGSX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PRGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIFX
GSIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GSIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRGSX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRGSXGSIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.19

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

1.35

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.44

5.19

+2.25

PRGSX vs. GSIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the GSIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRGSX and GSIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRGSX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRGSX drawdown since its inception was -64.06%, which is greater than GSIFX's maximum drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGSX and GSIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRGSXGSIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.06%

-59.25%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.77%

-12.15%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.13%

-13.56%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

-31.94%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.11%

-35.00%

-3.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.51%

-1.38%

-6.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.43%

-15.16%

+1.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

3.15%

+0.58%

Volatility

PRGSX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) at 4.25%. This indicates that PRGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRGSXGSIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.35%

4.25%

+3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.46%

13.16%

+5.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.37%

15.88%

+5.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.29%

17.00%

+3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.97%

17.12%

+2.85%

PRGSX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRGSX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRGSX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison

PRGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, more than GSIFX's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIFX
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A
2.04%2.18%2.30%1.37%0.82%6.29%0.00%1.67%1.45%1.25%2.79%1.16%
PRGSX
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund
8.34%9.60%6.73%0.27%0.00%13.67%5.67%2.21%5.81%0.03%0.63%0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRGSX and GSIFX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGSX has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to GSIFX (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGSX dropped -64.06% vs GSIFX's -59.25%.

PRGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRGSX and GSIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer