GSIFX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
GSIFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
GSIFX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSIFX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | -5.52% | 25.51% | 0.33% | 15.44% | -17.69% | 16.23% | 22.89% | 27.68% | -14.85% | 25.29% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIFX achieves a -5.52% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, GSIFX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.34%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.
GSIFX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- -5.52%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 11.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSIFX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIFX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSIFX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
GSIFX
VOO
GSIFX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSIFX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 0.98 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | 1.50 | -0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.23 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 1.53 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.23 | 7.29 | -4.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSIFX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 0.98 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.70 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.78 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.83 | -0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIFX and VOO is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSIFX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
GSIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | 2.31% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 1.37% | 0.82% | 6.29% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 2.79% | 1.16% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
GSIFX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIFX drawdown since its inception was -59.25%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIFX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIFX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.25% | -33.99% | -25.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.15% | -11.98% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.94% | -24.52% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -33.99% | -1.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.48% | -6.29% | -5.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.30% | -3.72% | -11.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.52% | +0.54% |
Volatility
GSIFX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that GSIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSIFX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 5.29% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.13% | 9.44% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 18.10% | -1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 16.82% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 17.99% | -0.67% |