PRGSX vs. CSUAX
PRGSX (T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund) and CSUAX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PRGSX returned 17.24%/yr vs 7.32%/yr for CSUAX. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRGSX charges 0.82%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for CSUAX.
Performance
PRGSX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRGSX achieves a 23.71% return, which is significantly higher than CSUAX's 9.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGSX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 17.24%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.32% annualized return.
PRGSX
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 23.71%
- 6M
- 23.94%
- 1Y
- 44.59%
- 3Y*
- 23.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 17.24%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 17.84%
- 3Y*
- 10.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.32%
PRGSX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGSX T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund | 23.71% | 21.42% | 16.80% | 25.70% | -28.01% | 9.81% | 52.29% | 35.84% | -4.51% | 32.64% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.88% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRGSX and CSUAX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2004 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PRGSX and CSUAX has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRGSX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
PRGSX
CSUAX
PRGSX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRGSX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.33 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 3.05 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.63 | 9.69 | +3.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRGSX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRGSX drawdown since its inception was -64.06%, which is greater than CSUAX's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGSX and CSUAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRGSX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.06% | -52.20% | -11.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.77% | -5.99% | -6.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.13% | -14.95% | -6.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.11% | -20.45% | -17.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.11% | -35.05% | -3.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -3.03% | +2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.46% | -8.43% | -5.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 1.87% | +1.35% |
Volatility
PRGSX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.40%. This indicates that PRGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRGSX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.93% | 3.40% | +5.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.75% | 7.99% | +8.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.56% | 9.86% | +9.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 12.99% | +6.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 14.92% | +4.99% |
PRGSX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRGSX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRGSX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
PRGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, more than CSUAX's 7.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.36% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
PRGSX T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund | 7.76% | 9.60% | 6.73% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 13.67% | 5.67% | 2.21% | 5.81% | 0.03% | 0.63% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRGSX and CSUAX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRGSX has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to CSUAX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGSX dropped -64.06% vs CSUAX's -52.20%.
PRGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRGSX and CSUAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer