PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRGS vs. NKE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRGS vs. NKE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) and NIKE, Inc. (NKE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRGS achieves a -26.75% return, which is significantly higher than NKE's -28.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGS has outperformed NKE with an annualized return of 3.19%, while NKE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.48% annualized return.


PRGS

1D
-0.38%
1M
17.43%
YTD
-26.75%
6M
-29.75%
1Y
-49.74%
3Y*
-19.45%
5Y*
-7.35%
10Y*
3.19%

NKE

1D
-2.24%
1M
8.24%
YTD
-28.37%
6M
-32.37%
1Y
-23.74%
3Y*
-23.49%
5Y*
-18.04%
10Y*
-0.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRGS vs. NKE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRGS
Progress Software Corporation
-26.75%-34.06%21.16%8.94%6.05%8.44%10.64%18.95%-15.41%35.45%
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
-28.37%-13.83%-29.11%-6.01%-29.04%18.70%40.97%38.09%19.87%24.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PRGS and NKE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 1991

0.26

The correlation between PRGS and NKE shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRGS:

$1.34B

NKE:

$66.51B

EPS

PRGS:

$1.95

NKE:

$1.52

PE Ratio

PRGS:

16.10

NKE:

29.55

PS Ratio

PRGS:

1.39

NKE:

1.43

PB Ratio

PRGS:

2.70

NKE:

4.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRGS:

$987.62M

NKE:

$46.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRGS:

$802.40M

NKE:

$18.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRGS:

$136.06M

NKE:

$3.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRGS vs. NKE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRGS
PRGS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PRGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGS Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

NKE
NKE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NKE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NKE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRGS vs. NKE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) and NIKE, Inc. (NKE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRGSNKEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

0.89

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

-0.58

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

-1.09

-0.21

PRGS vs. NKE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRGS Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the NKE Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRGS and NKE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRGS vs. NKE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRGS drawdown since its inception was -67.33%, smaller than the maximum NKE drawdown of -75.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGS and NKE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRGSNKEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.33%

-75.19%

+7.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.14%

-46.18%

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.10%

-64.21%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.10%

-74.64%

+10.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.10%

-74.64%

+10.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.97%

-72.55%

+17.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.57%

-20.93%

-2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.81%

24.38%

+14.43%

Volatility

PRGS vs. NKE - Volatility Comparison

Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) has a higher volatility of 14.81% compared to NIKE, Inc. (NKE) at 10.43%. This indicates that PRGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NKE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRGSNKEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.81%

10.43%

+4.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.69%

29.43%

+12.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.89%

38.48%

+10.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.42%

35.91%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.17%

32.29%

+0.88%

Dividends

PRGS vs. NKE - Dividend Comparison

PRGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NKE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
3.63%2.53%2.00%1.28%1.07%0.68%0.71%0.89%1.11%1.18%1.30%0.93%
PRGS
Progress Software Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.81%1.29%1.39%1.45%1.48%1.52%1.62%1.21%0.39%0.00%

Financials

PRGS vs. NKE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Progress Software Corporation and NIKE, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
247.80M
11.28B
(PRGS) Total Revenue
(NKE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PRGS vs. NKE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Progress Software Corporation and NIKE, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
82.3%
40.2%
Portfolio components
PRGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Progress Software Corporation reported a gross profit of 203.94M and revenue of 247.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.3%.

NKE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.53B and revenue of 11.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.

PRGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Progress Software Corporation reported an operating income of 46.47M and revenue of 247.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.

NKE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported an operating income of 553.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

PRGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Progress Software Corporation reported a net income of 22.81M and revenue of 247.80M, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.

NKE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported a net income of 520.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PRGS and NKE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGS has higher volatility (14.81%) compared to NKE (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGS dropped -67.33% vs NKE's -75.19%.

NKE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.69 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRGS and NKE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer