PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFD vs. SPFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFD vs. SPFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) and Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFD achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than SPFF's 6.91% return.


PRFD

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.56%
1Y
8.04%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
10Y*

SPFF

1D
-0.20%
1M
3.90%
YTD
6.91%
6M
8.28%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
3.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFD vs. SPFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PRFD
PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
1.40%8.45%9.92%1.83%
SPFF
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
6.91%7.52%8.62%-4.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFD and SPFF is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2023

0.50

The correlation between PRFD and SPFF shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRFD vs. SPFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRFD
SPFF

Financial Services

2.0%
54.4%

Communication Services

0.3%
2.0%

Basic Materials

-

2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

3.2%

Industrials

-

1.8%

Real Estate

-

2.1%

Technology

-

18.3%

Utilities

-

14.2%

Financial Services

PRFD
2.0%
SPFF
54.4%

Communication Services

PRFD
0.3%
SPFF
2.0%

Basic Materials

PRFD

-

SPFF
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PRFD

-

SPFF
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

PRFD

-

SPFF

-

Energy

PRFD

-

SPFF

-

Healthcare

PRFD

-

SPFF
3.2%

Industrials

PRFD

-

SPFF
1.8%

Real Estate

PRFD

-

SPFF
2.1%

Technology

PRFD

-

SPFF
18.3%

Utilities

PRFD

-

SPFF
14.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFD vs. SPFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFD
PRFD Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PRFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFD Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SPFF
SPFF Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SPFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPFF Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SPFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPFF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFD vs. SPFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) and Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRFDSPFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.34

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.45

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.14

7.46

+2.68

PRFD vs. SPFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFD Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the SPFF Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFD and SPFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRFDSPFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

1.96

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

0.30

+1.01

Drawdowns

PRFD vs. SPFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFD drawdown since its inception was -11.93%, smaller than the maximum SPFF drawdown of -35.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFD and SPFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFDSPFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.93%

-35.92%

+23.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.28%

-7.58%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.28%

-12.51%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.20%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-4.06%

+1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

2.49%

-1.70%

Volatility

PRFD vs. SPFF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) is 1.19%, while Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that PRFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFDSPFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

2.97%

-1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.68%

7.29%

-4.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21%

9.53%

-6.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.88%

10.93%

-6.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.88%

13.51%

-8.63%

PRFD vs. SPFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFD has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than SPFF's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFD vs. SPFF - Dividend Comparison

PRFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, less than SPFF's 6.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRFD
PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
5.77%5.63%5.53%5.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPFF
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
6.34%6.47%6.39%6.64%7.15%5.78%5.75%5.97%7.60%7.24%7.04%7.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRFD and SPFF have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPFF has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to PRFD (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFD dropped -11.93% vs SPFF's -35.92%.

On 3-year performance, PRFD leads with 9.23% vs 8.98% for SPFF. On fees, SPFF is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PRFD has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PRFD has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 8.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPFF is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for PRFD.

SPFF has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 5.77% for PRFD.

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for PRFD and 0.58% for SPFF.

PRFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFD and SPFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer