PRF vs. BGIG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) and BGIG (Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. PRF is passively managed, while BGIG is actively managed. Over the past year, PRF returned 32.80% vs 19.51% for BGIG. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BGIG.

Performance

PRF vs. BGIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRF achieves a 14.79% return, which is significantly higher than BGIG's 9.84% return.

PRF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 14.79%
• 6M: 15.01%
• 1Y: 32.80%
• 3Y*: 21.40%
• 5Y*: 12.43%
• 10Y*: 13.67%

BGIG

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 9.84%
• 6M: 9.56%
• 1Y: 19.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRF vs. BGIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	14.79%	18.33%	16.73%	7.48%
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	9.84%	12.49%	16.84%	4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between PRF and BGIG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023	0.84

The correlation between PRF and BGIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRF vs. BGIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRF	BGIG
Technology	20.9%	24.6%
Financial Services	15.4%	14.8%
Healthcare	11.7%	14.6%
Communication Services	10.2%	-
Industrials	9.2%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	5.4%
Energy	8.2%	11.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	6.9%
Basic Materials	3.4%	0.6%
Utilities	3.1%	7.9%
Real Estate	2.5%	3.5%

Return for Risk

PRF vs. BGIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRF

PRF Risk / Return Rank: 89
PRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PRF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PRF Martin Ratio Rank: 89

BGIG

BGIG Risk / Return Rank: 68
BGIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BGIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BGIG Omega Ratio Rank: 65
BGIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BGIG Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRF vs. BGIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRF	BGIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	2.18	+0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.33	3.13	+1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.39	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.00	3.37	+1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.67	12.97	+7.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRF vs. BGIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRF Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the BGIG Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRF and BGIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRF	BGIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.10	2.18	+0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	1.38	-0.90

Drawdowns

PRF vs. BGIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRF drawdown since its inception was -60.35%, which is greater than BGIG's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRF and BGIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRF	BGIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.35%	-13.24%	-47.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.59%	-5.81%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.28%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.93%	-1.70%	-5.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	1.51%	+0.08%

Volatility

PRF vs. BGIG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG) have volatilities of 2.64% and 2.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRF	BGIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.64%	2.57%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.74%	6.72%	+1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.63%	9.00%	+1.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.18%	11.94%	+3.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.67%	11.94%	+5.73%

PRF vs. BGIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than BGIG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRF vs. BGIG - Dividend Comparison

PRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than BGIG's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	1.75%	1.89%	2.02%	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	1.38%	1.59%	1.78%	1.84%	2.01%	1.58%	1.97%	1.99%	2.25%	1.58%	2.17%	2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRF and BGIG in my portfolio?

PRF and BGIG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRF or BGIG?

PRF has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to BGIG (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRF dropped -60.35% vs BGIG's -13.24%.

Which ETF is better, PRF or BGIG?

On 1-year performance, PRF leads with 32.80% vs 19.51% for BGIG. On fees, PRF is cheaper at 0.34% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRF or BGIG?

Over the 1-year period, PRF has performed better with a 32.80% return vs 19.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRF or BGIG?

PRF is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for BGIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRF or BGIG?

BGIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.38% for PRF.

What is the main difference between PRF and BGIG?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for PRF and 0.45% for BGIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.