PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PREF vs. IG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PREF vs. IG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Spectrum Preferred Secs Active ETF (PREF) and Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PREF

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.32%
1Y
6.65%
3Y*
9.25%
5Y*
3.07%
10Y*

IG

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.57%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PREF vs. IG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PREF and IG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026

0.77

PREF vs. IG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PREF
IG

Financial Services

100.0%
2.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

PREF
100.0%
IG
2.9%

Basic Materials

PREF

-

IG

-

Communication Services

PREF

-

IG

-

Consumer Cyclical

PREF

-

IG

-

Consumer Defensive

PREF

-

IG

-

Energy

PREF

-

IG

-

Healthcare

PREF

-

IG

-

Industrials

PREF

-

IG

-

Real Estate

PREF

-

IG

-

Technology

PREF

-

IG

-

Utilities

PREF

-

IG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PREF vs. IG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PREF
PREF Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PREF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PREF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PREF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PREF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PREF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

IG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PREF vs. IG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Spectrum Preferred Secs Active ETF (PREF) and Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PREFIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.09

PREF vs. IG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PREFIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

-0.40

+1.06

Drawdowns

PREF vs. IG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PREF drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, which is greater than IG's maximum drawdown of -1.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PREF and IG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PREFIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.99%

-1.75%

-21.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.32%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-0.53%

-3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

Volatility

PREF vs. IG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PREFIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09%

4.90%

-1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.87%

4.90%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.30%

4.90%

+1.40%

PREF vs. IG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PREF has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IG's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

PREF vs. IG - Dividend Comparison

PREF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than IG's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IG
Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF
0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PREF
Principal Spectrum Preferred Secs Active ETF
5.16%4.87%4.65%4.67%4.63%4.07%4.35%4.67%5.49%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


PREF and IG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IG is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IG is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PREF.

PREF has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 0.84% for IG.

PREF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while IG is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PREF and 0.26% for IG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PREF and IG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer