PRDGX vs. MCSFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PRDGX (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.) and MCSFX (MFS Commodity Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - PRDGX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while MCSFX is a Commodities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 5 years, PRDGX returned 9.87%/yr vs 10.39%/yr for MCSFX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRDGX charges 0.62%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for MCSFX.

Performance

PRDGX vs. MCSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRDGX achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than MCSFX's 23.89% return.

PRDGX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 6.75%
• 6M: 7.44%
• 1Y: 16.67%
• 3Y*: 15.24%
• 5Y*: 9.87%
• 10Y*: 12.78%

MCSFX

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -1.11%
• YTD: 23.89%
• 6M: 24.64%
• 1Y: 38.04%
• 3Y*: 15.99%
• 5Y*: 10.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRDGX vs. MCSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.	6.75%	14.74%	13.48%	13.68%	-10.22%	26.03%	13.92%	17.61%
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund	23.89%	17.09%	4.32%	-7.25%	12.27%	26.40%	-1.34%	-1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PRDGX and MCSFX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019	0.19

The correlation between PRDGX and MCSFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PRDGX vs. MCSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRDGX

PRDGX Risk / Return Rank: 38
PRDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
PRDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
PRDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
PRDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PRDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

MCSFX

MCSFX Risk / Return Rank: 77
MCSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
MCSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
MCSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MCSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
MCSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRDGX vs. MCSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRDGX	MCSFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	2.60	-0.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	3.26	-0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.47	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.37	4.87	-2.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.72	15.48	-5.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRDGX vs. MCSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRDGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the MCSFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRDGX and MCSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRDGX	MCSFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	2.60	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.31	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.33	+0.34

Drawdowns

PRDGX vs. MCSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRDGX drawdown since its inception was -49.79%, which is greater than MCSFX's maximum drawdown of -37.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRDGX and MCSFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRDGX	MCSFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.79%	-37.16%	-12.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.34%	-8.19%	+0.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.15%	-9.60%	-4.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.31%	-37.16%	+17.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-3.46%	+3.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.42%	-18.29%	+12.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	2.58%	-0.79%

Volatility

PRDGX vs. MCSFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) is 2.26%, while MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that PRDGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRDGX	MCSFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.26%	4.71%	-2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.54%	13.75%	-6.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.71%	15.90%	-6.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.06%	34.15%	-20.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.88%	29.58%	-13.70%

PRDGX vs. MCSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRDGX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSFX's 1.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRDGX vs. MCSFX - Dividend Comparison

PRDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%, less than MCSFX's 12.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund	12.14%	15.05%	2.25%	1.04%	26.24%	54.80%	0.15%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.	7.58%	8.02%	4.66%	2.78%	3.81%	2.00%	1.03%	2.33%	3.67%	1.82%	3.07%	7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRDGX and MCSFX in my portfolio?

PRDGX and MCSFX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRDGX or MCSFX?

MCSFX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to PRDGX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRDGX dropped -49.79% vs MCSFX's -37.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.