PRCS vs. BUFH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PRCS (Parnassus Core Select ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRCS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Parnassus, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRCS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.

Performance

PRCS vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parnassus Core Select ETF (PRCS) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PRCS having a 2.42% return and BUFH slightly lower at 2.30%.

PRCS

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -0.51%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 6M: 1.81%
• 1Y: 11.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFH

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 2.30%
• 6M: 2.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRCS vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PRCS Parnassus Core Select ETF	2.42%	7.41%
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	2.30%	3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PRCS and BUFH is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

PRCS vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRCS

PRCS Risk / Return Rank: 24
PRCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
PRCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
PRCS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PRCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
PRCS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

BUFH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRCS vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parnassus Core Select ETF (PRCS) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRCS	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.46	—	—

Drawdowns

PRCS vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRCS drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRCS and BUFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRCS	BUFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.20%	-1.53%	-16.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.27%	-0.26%	-2.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	-0.18%	-2.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PRCS	BUFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.74%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.62%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.07%	2.38%	+10.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.95%	2.38%	+14.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.95%	2.38%	+14.57%

PRCS vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRCS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRCS vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

PRCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%
PRCS Parnassus Core Select ETF	0.13%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRCS and BUFH in my portfolio?

PRCS and BUFH have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PRCS or BUFH?

On fees, PRCS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRCS or BUFH?

PRCS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRCS or BUFH?

PRCS has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

What is the main difference between PRCS and BUFH?

PRCS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Parnassus and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PRCS and 0.95% for BUFH.