PRCPX vs. XILSX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX).
PRCPX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High-Yield 2% Issuer Capped Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 29, 2014. XILSX is managed by Amundi. It was launched on Dec 16, 2014.
Performance
PRCPX vs. XILSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRCPX vs. XILSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | -0.13% | 14.80% | 7.46% | 14.90% | -10.50% | 6.36% | 5.55% | 13.77% | -1.44% | 5.30% |
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund | 5.18% | 18.70% | 18.93% | 18.65% | 1.23% | -1.10% | 7.37% | 2.60% | -2.11% | -8.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRCPX achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly lower than XILSX's 5.18% return.
PRCPX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 13.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
XILSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 5.18%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 25.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRCPX vs. XILSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRCPX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than XILSX's 1.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRCPX vs. XILSX — Risk / Return Rank
PRCPX
XILSX
PRCPX vs. XILSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRCPX | XILSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.47 | 8.38 | -4.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.52 | 71.70 | -66.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.93 | 31.20 | -29.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 120.30 | -115.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.08 | 749.82 | -728.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRCPX | XILSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47 | 8.38 | -4.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 3.19 | -1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 1.58 | -0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRCPX and XILSX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PRCPX vs. XILSX - Dividend Comparison
PRCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.89%, more than XILSX's 9.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | 12.89% | 12.19% | 7.03% | 7.88% | 4.89% | 5.11% | 5.36% | 5.18% | 5.72% | 4.95% | 5.88% | 7.58% |
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund | 9.04% | 9.51% | 13.06% | 12.82% | 2.68% | 2.04% | 5.20% | 6.63% | 6.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PRCPX vs. XILSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRCPX drawdown since its inception was -23.07%, which is greater than XILSX's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRCPX and XILSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRCPX | XILSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.07% | -14.53% | -8.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.03% | -0.21% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.34% | -6.27% | -8.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | 0.00% | -1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.16% | -5.00% | +1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 0.03% | +0.62% |
Volatility
PRCPX vs. XILSX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) at 0.73%. This indicates that PRCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XILSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRCPX | XILSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 0.73% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.52% | 2.18% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11% | 3.04% | +1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.79% | 3.75% | +1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 3.95% | +1.50% |