PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRCNX vs. TRBCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRCNX vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund (PRCNX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRCNX achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly higher than TRBCX's 4.00% return. Over the past 10 years, PRCNX has underperformed TRBCX with an annualized return of 7.57%, while TRBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.53% annualized return.


PRCNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
4.49%
6M
6.72%
1Y
15.06%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
7.57%

TRBCX

1D
-1.40%
1M
3.39%
YTD
4.00%
6M
3.88%
1Y
19.70%
3Y*
28.20%
5Y*
13.20%
10Y*
17.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRCNX vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRCNX
T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund
4.49%27.91%1.64%16.90%-10.61%5.19%4.39%24.53%-10.69%19.41%
TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund
4.00%18.78%48.46%49.42%-38.57%17.54%34.73%29.97%2.00%36.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PRCNX and TRBCX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2014

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between PRCNX and TRBCX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRCNX vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRCNX
PRCNX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PRCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PRCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

TRBCX
TRBCX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TRBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TRBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRCNX vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund (PRCNX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRCNXTRBCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.22

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.21

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.02

4.08

-0.06

PRCNX vs. TRBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the TRBCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRCNX and TRBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRCNXTRBCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.23

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.55

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.77

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.60

-0.20

Drawdowns

PRCNX vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRCNX drawdown since its inception was -32.32%, smaller than the maximum TRBCX drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRCNX and TRBCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRCNXTRBCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.32%

-54.56%

+22.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.83%

-17.01%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.39%

-23.08%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.73%

-43.63%

+14.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.32%

-43.63%

+11.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-2.08%

-2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-11.30%

+5.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

5.02%

-1.13%

Volatility

PRCNX vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund (PRCNX) is 0.00%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that PRCNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRCNXTRBCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

3.90%

-3.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

13.44%

-3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.27%

16.72%

-3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

24.03%

-9.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

22.79%

-7.62%

PRCNX vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRCNX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRCNX vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison

PRCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.59%, more than TRBCX's 5.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRCNX
T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund
29.59%14.08%4.36%3.16%3.50%14.31%2.64%5.28%4.00%3.57%1.63%2.45%
TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund
5.04%5.25%18.16%3.49%5.87%9.38%1.19%0.36%2.44%2.94%0.67%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRCNX and TRBCX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRBCX has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to PRCNX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRCNX dropped -32.32% vs TRBCX's -54.56%.

TRBCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRCNX and TRBCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer