PRCNX vs. FACNX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund (PRCNX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX).
PRCNX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Aug 22, 2014. FACNX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 2007.
Performance
PRCNX vs. FACNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRCNX vs. FACNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRCNX T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund | -0.47% | 27.91% | 1.64% | 16.90% | -10.61% | 5.19% | 4.39% | 24.53% | -10.69% | 19.41% |
FACNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A | 2.75% | 25.49% | 8.83% | 14.33% | -6.44% | 26.44% | 4.11% | 25.42% | -14.59% | 12.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRCNX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than FACNX's 2.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PRCNX has underperformed FACNX with an annualized return of 7.57%, while FACNX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.13% annualized return.
PRCNX
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 17.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
FACNX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 7.71%
- 1Y
- 23.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRCNX vs. FACNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRCNX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than FACNX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRCNX vs. FACNX — Risk / Return Rank
PRCNX
FACNX
PRCNX vs. FACNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund (PRCNX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRCNX | FACNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 1.63 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 2.25 | -0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 2.63 | -1.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.21 | 11.47 | -6.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRCNX | FACNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.63 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.71 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.58 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.27 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRCNX and FACNX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRCNX vs. FACNX - Dividend Comparison
PRCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.15%, more than FACNX's 5.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRCNX T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund | 14.15% | 14.08% | 4.36% | 3.16% | 3.50% | 14.31% | 2.64% | 5.28% | 4.00% | 3.57% | 1.63% | 2.45% |
FACNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A | 5.27% | 5.41% | 7.14% | 3.06% | 3.79% | 4.86% | 2.28% | 4.13% | 6.91% | 0.89% | 1.31% | 0.15% |
Drawdowns
PRCNX vs. FACNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRCNX drawdown since its inception was -32.32%, smaller than the maximum FACNX drawdown of -58.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRCNX and FACNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRCNX | FACNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.32% | -58.18% | +25.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.83% | -8.34% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.73% | -21.12% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.32% | -39.88% | +7.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.18% | -5.29% | -3.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -12.25% | +6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 2.32% | +1.08% |
Volatility
PRCNX vs. FACNX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund (PRCNX) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX) at 4.78%. This indicates that PRCNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FACNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRCNX | FACNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.70% | 4.78% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 10.39% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.70% | 15.67% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.76% | 15.96% | -1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 17.50% | -2.29% |