PRCNX vs. FCCNX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund (PRCNX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX).
PRCNX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Aug 22, 2014. FCCNX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 2007.
Performance
PRCNX vs. FCCNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRCNX vs. FCCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRCNX T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund | -0.47% | 27.91% | 1.64% | 16.90% | -10.61% | 5.19% | 4.39% | 24.53% | -10.69% | 19.41% |
FCCNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C | 2.55% | 24.54% | 8.02% | 13.45% | -7.16% | 25.48% | 3.30% | 24.51% | -15.19% | 12.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRCNX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than FCCNX's 2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, PRCNX has underperformed FCCNX with an annualized return of 7.57%, while FCCNX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.39% annualized return.
PRCNX
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 17.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
FCCNX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- 2.55%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- 1Y
- 22.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRCNX vs. FCCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRCNX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than FCCNX's 1.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRCNX vs. FCCNX — Risk / Return Rank
PRCNX
FCCNX
PRCNX vs. FCCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund (PRCNX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRCNX | FCCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 1.57 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 2.17 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.31 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 2.53 | -1.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.21 | 10.96 | -5.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRCNX | FCCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.57 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.65 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.54 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.24 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRCNX and FCCNX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRCNX vs. FCCNX - Dividend Comparison
PRCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.15%, more than FCCNX's 4.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRCNX T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund | 14.15% | 14.08% | 4.36% | 3.16% | 3.50% | 14.31% | 2.64% | 5.28% | 4.00% | 3.57% | 1.63% | 2.45% |
FCCNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C | 4.57% | 4.69% | 6.15% | 2.29% | 2.74% | 3.65% | 1.40% | 3.06% | 6.14% | 0.91% | 0.61% | 0.15% |
Drawdowns
PRCNX vs. FCCNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRCNX drawdown since its inception was -32.32%, smaller than the maximum FCCNX drawdown of -58.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRCNX and FCCNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRCNX | FCCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.32% | -58.44% | +26.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.83% | -8.36% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.73% | -21.39% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.32% | -39.97% | +7.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.18% | -5.35% | -3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -13.41% | +7.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 2.34% | +1.06% |
Volatility
PRCNX vs. FCCNX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund (PRCNX) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX) at 4.78%. This indicates that PRCNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRCNX | FCCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.70% | 4.78% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 10.39% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.70% | 15.66% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.76% | 15.96% | -1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 17.49% | -2.28% |