PRAY vs. RSSY
PRAY (FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF) and RSSY (Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. PRAY is passively managed, while RSSY is actively managed. Over the past year, PRAY returned 21.06% vs 47.81% for RSSY. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRAY charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for RSSY.
Performance
PRAY vs. RSSY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRAY achieves a 14.78% return, which is significantly lower than RSSY's 32.45% return.
PRAY
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 3.83%
- YTD
- 14.78%
- 6M
- 14.02%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSSY
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 32.45%
- 6M
- 27.13%
- 1Y
- 47.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRAY vs. RSSY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PRAY FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF | 14.78% | 9.08% | 7.35% |
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF | 32.45% | -3.52% | 1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRAY and RSSY is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2024 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRAY vs. RSSY — Risk / Return Rank
PRAY
RSSY
PRAY vs. RSSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRAY | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 3.63 | -1.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 4.78 | -2.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.65 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 6.53 | -4.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.57 | 22.39 | -11.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRAY | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 3.63 | -1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.75 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
PRAY vs. RSSY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRAY drawdown since its inception was -21.40%, smaller than the maximum RSSY drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAY and RSSY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRAY | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.40% | -29.57% | +8.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.80% | -7.36% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.16% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -7.37% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.14% | -0.14% |
Volatility
PRAY vs. RSSY - Volatility Comparison
FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) at 2.30%. This indicates that PRAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRAY | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 2.30% | +1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.58% | 9.92% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.70% | 13.28% | -0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 18.35% | -2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 18.35% | -2.35% |
PRAY vs. RSSY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRAY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than RSSY's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRAY vs. RSSY - Dividend Comparison
PRAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than RSSY's 1.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRAY FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF | 0.60% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 0.83% | 1.20% |
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF | 1.54% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRAY and RSSY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRAY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to RSSY (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRAY dropped -21.40% vs RSSY's -29.57%.
On 1-year performance, RSSY leads with 47.81% vs 21.06% for PRAY. On fees, PRAY is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, RSSY has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSSY has performed better with a 47.81% return vs 21.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PRAY is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.
RSSY has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.60% for PRAY.
They also come from different issuers: Faith Investor Services and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for PRAY and 1.04% for RSSY.
RSSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRAY and RSSY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer