PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRASX vs. MAPTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRASX vs. MAPTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRASX achieves a 32.48% return, which is significantly lower than MAPTX's 38.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PRASX has outperformed MAPTX with an annualized return of 10.37%, while MAPTX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.36% annualized return.


PRASX

1D
0.76%
1M
9.54%
YTD
32.48%
6M
34.20%
1Y
57.12%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
10.37%

MAPTX

1D
0.84%
1M
9.12%
YTD
38.53%
6M
40.60%
1Y
68.37%
3Y*
21.81%
5Y*
2.00%
10Y*
7.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRASX vs. MAPTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRASX
T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund
32.48%26.60%6.97%0.83%-22.60%-4.33%29.56%26.75%-15.13%40.64%
MAPTX
Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund
38.53%30.07%3.25%-4.82%-20.69%-17.92%28.88%10.75%-11.05%39.94%

Correlation

The correlation between PRASX and MAPTX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 1994

0.88

The correlation between PRASX and MAPTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRASX vs. MAPTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRASX
PRASX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PRASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRASX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PRASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRASX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

MAPTX
MAPTX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MAPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MAPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRASX vs. MAPTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRASXMAPTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.63

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

5.12

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.70

18.58

-3.88

PRASX vs. MAPTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRASX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the MAPTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRASX and MAPTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRASX vs. MAPTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRASX drawdown since its inception was -70.53%, roughly equal to the maximum MAPTX drawdown of -69.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRASX and MAPTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRASXMAPTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.53%

-69.79%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.39%

-14.03%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

-22.23%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.56%

-48.55%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.07%

-52.31%

+7.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.50%

-17.42%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

3.81%

+0.06%

Volatility

PRASX vs. MAPTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX) is 11.93%, while Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX) has a volatility of 12.64%. This indicates that PRASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAPTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRASXMAPTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.93%

12.64%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.50%

20.22%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.91%

22.31%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.61%

20.59%

-0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.59%

18.53%

+0.06%

PRASX vs. MAPTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRASX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MAPTX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRASX vs. MAPTX - Dividend Comparison

PRASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than MAPTX's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAPTX
Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund
1.68%2.33%8.93%2.93%8.52%4.85%5.74%3.44%4.78%1.25%2.61%11.18%
PRASX
T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund
0.47%0.62%1.05%1.77%1.96%14.22%0.46%0.77%7.23%9.15%0.46%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PRASX and MAPTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MAPTX has higher volatility (12.64%) compared to PRASX (11.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRASX dropped -70.53% vs MAPTX's -69.79%.

MAPTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRASX and MAPTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer