PRAM.L vs. XDEX.L
PRAM.L (Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)) and XDEX.L (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from Amundi and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PRAM.L returned 23.23%/yr vs 25.86%/yr for XDEX.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRAM.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XDEX.L.
Performance
PRAM.L vs. XDEX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PRAM.L is traded in USD, while XDEX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRAM.L achieves a 24.27% return, which is significantly lower than XDEX.L's 37.17% return.
PRAM.L
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 24.27%
- 6M
- 27.23%
- 1Y
- 49.84%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDEX.L
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 7.01%
- YTD
- 37.17%
- 6M
- 43.65%
- 1Y
- 72.14%
- 3Y*
- 25.86%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.27%
PRAM.L vs. XDEX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRAM.L Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) | 24.27% | 32.60% | 7.14% | 9.82% | -16.79% | 0.00% |
XDEX.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 37.17% | 37.83% | 1.15% | 8.32% | -19.84% | 3.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRAM.L and XDEX.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2021 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, PRAM.L and XDEX.L have become more correlated (0.90) than their long-term average of 0.62, meaning their price movements have been converging.
PRAM.L vs. XDEX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRAM.L
XDEX.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
PRAM.L
XDEX.L
Financial Services
PRAM.L
XDEX.L
Consumer Cyclical
PRAM.L
XDEX.L
Industrials
PRAM.L
XDEX.L
Communication Services
PRAM.L
XDEX.L
Basic Materials
PRAM.L
XDEX.L
Energy
PRAM.L
XDEX.L
Healthcare
PRAM.L
XDEX.L
Consumer Defensive
PRAM.L
XDEX.L
Utilities
PRAM.L
XDEX.L
Real Estate
PRAM.L
XDEX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRAM.L vs. XDEX.L — Risk / Return Rank
PRAM.L
XDEX.L
PRAM.L vs. XDEX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XDEX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRAM.L | XDEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.64 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 4.79 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.36 | 18.76 | -4.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRAM.L | XDEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 3.58 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.67 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
PRAM.L vs. XDEX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRAM.L drawdown since its inception was -28.74%, smaller than the maximum XDEX.L drawdown of -32.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAM.L and XDEX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRAM.L | XDEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.74% | -32.75% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | -14.99% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.73% | -19.39% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.13% | -2.99% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.60% | -7.06% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 3.83% | -0.37% |
Volatility
PRAM.L vs. XDEX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) is 8.38%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XDEX.L) has a volatility of 9.58%. This indicates that PRAM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRAM.L | XDEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.38% | 9.58% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.56% | 17.85% | -1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.30% | 20.05% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 17.75% | +3.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 16.98% | +4.41% |
PRAM.L vs. XDEX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRAM.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEX.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PRAM.L vs. XDEX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither PRAM.L nor XDEX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PRAM.L and XDEX.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRAM.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRAM.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XDEX.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PRAM.L and 0.18% for XDEX.L.
Find the right allocation for PRAM.L and XDEX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer