PRAM.L vs. VDEM.L
PRAM.L (Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)) and VDEM.L (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - PRAM.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD while VDEM.L tracks the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PRAM.L returned 23.23%/yr vs 18.24%/yr for VDEM.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRAM.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VDEM.L.
Performance
PRAM.L vs. VDEM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRAM.L achieves a 24.27% return, which is significantly higher than VDEM.L's 11.28% return.
PRAM.L
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 24.27%
- 6M
- 27.23%
- 1Y
- 49.84%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VDEM.L
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 6M
- 12.84%
- 1Y
- 29.05%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
PRAM.L vs. VDEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRAM.L Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) | 24.27% | 32.60% | 7.14% | 9.82% | -16.79% | 0.00% |
VDEM.L Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS | 11.28% | 25.92% | 12.28% | 7.28% | -17.20% | 2.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRAM.L and VDEM.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2021 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, PRAM.L and VDEM.L have become more correlated (0.95) than their long-term average of 0.69, meaning their price movements have been converging.
PRAM.L vs. VDEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRAM.L
VDEM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
PRAM.L
VDEM.L
Financial Services
PRAM.L
VDEM.L
Consumer Cyclical
PRAM.L
VDEM.L
Industrials
PRAM.L
VDEM.L
Communication Services
PRAM.L
VDEM.L
Basic Materials
PRAM.L
VDEM.L
Energy
PRAM.L
VDEM.L
Healthcare
PRAM.L
VDEM.L
Consumer Defensive
PRAM.L
VDEM.L
Utilities
PRAM.L
VDEM.L
Real Estate
PRAM.L
VDEM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRAM.L vs. VDEM.L — Risk / Return Rank
PRAM.L
VDEM.L
PRAM.L vs. VDEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS (VDEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRAM.L | VDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.32 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 2.72 | +1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.36 | 9.29 | +5.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRAM.L | VDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 1.80 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.35 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
PRAM.L vs. VDEM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRAM.L drawdown since its inception was -28.74%, smaller than the maximum VDEM.L drawdown of -36.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAM.L and VDEM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRAM.L | VDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.74% | -36.63% | +7.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | -10.65% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.73% | -15.97% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.13% | -1.85% | -1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.60% | -12.68% | +4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 3.12% | +0.34% |
Volatility
PRAM.L vs. VDEM.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) has a higher volatility of 8.38% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS (VDEM.L) at 6.21%. This indicates that PRAM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRAM.L | VDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.38% | 6.21% | +2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.56% | 13.31% | +3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.30% | 16.15% | +3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 17.80% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 18.75% | +2.64% |
PRAM.L vs. VDEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRAM.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VDEM.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PRAM.L vs. VDEM.L - Dividend Comparison
PRAM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VDEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRAM.L Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDEM.L Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS | 2.04% | 2.34% | 2.38% | 2.58% | 3.27% | 2.30% | 1.81% | 2.33% | 2.82% | 2.16% | 2.40% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, PRAM.L and VDEM.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PRAM.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRAM.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VDEM.L.
PRAM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while VDEM.L tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PRAM.L and 0.22% for VDEM.L.
Find the right allocation for PRAM.L and VDEM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer