PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRAM.L vs. IPOL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRAM.L vs. IPOL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IPOL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PRAM.L having a 14.40% return and IPOL.L slightly higher at 14.81%.


PRAM.L

1D
-2.05%
1M
-9.53%
6M
8.92%
YTD
14.40%
1Y
28.83%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
10Y*

IPOL.L

1D
-1.18%
1M
-2.95%
6M
12.69%
YTD
14.81%
1Y
30.84%
3Y*
28.08%
5Y*
14.78%
10Y*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRAM.L vs. IPOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PRAM.L
Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)
14.40%32.60%7.09%9.87%-17.96%-0.87%
IPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
14.81%72.75%-6.10%49.20%-26.61%-5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between PRAM.L and IPOL.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2021

0.57

The correlation between PRAM.L and IPOL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRAM.L vs. IPOL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRAM.L
PRAM.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PRAM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

IPOL.L
IPOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IPOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRAM.L vs. IPOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IPOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRAM.LIPOL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.22

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

2.93

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.02

6.74

+0.28

PRAM.L vs. IPOL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the IPOL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAM.L and IPOL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRAM.L vs. IPOL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, smaller than the maximum IPOL.L drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAM.L and IPOL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRAM.LIPOL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.21%

-68.05%

+36.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.51%

-10.48%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.74%

-22.43%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.32%

-2.95%

-8.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.59%

-29.57%

+18.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

4.57%

-0.47%

Volatility

PRAM.L vs. IPOL.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) has a higher volatility of 8.81% compared to iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IPOL.L) at 5.32%. This indicates that PRAM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRAM.LIPOL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.81%

5.32%

+3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.52%

19.48%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.62%

24.82%

-3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

30.15%

-11.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

27.40%

-8.75%

PRAM.L vs. IPOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAM.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOL.L's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRAM.L vs. IPOL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRAM.L nor IPOL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PRAM.L and IPOL.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRAM.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRAM.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IPOL.L.

PRAM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while IPOL.L tracks MSCI Emerging - Poland in Net USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PRAM.L and 0.74% for IPOL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRAM.L and IPOL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer