PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRAC.L vs. WRDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRAC.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc (PRAC.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRAC.L is traded in USD, while WRDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WRDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAC.L achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than WRDA.L's 10.11% return.


PRAC.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.21%
6M
-1.78%
YTD
-0.60%
1Y
2.67%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
-1.71%
10Y*

WRDA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
6M
8.92%
YTD
10.11%
1Y
22.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRAC.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PRAC.L
Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc
-0.60%2.50%1.60%
WRDA.L
UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.11%21.28%17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PRAC.L and WRDA.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024

0.48

The correlation between PRAC.L and WRDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRAC.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRAC.L
PRAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PRAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

WRDA.L
WRDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRAC.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc (PRAC.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRAC.LWRDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.34

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

0.80

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.83

1.20

-0.37

PRAC.L vs. WRDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAC.L and WRDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRAC.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAC.L drawdown since its inception was -30.92%, which is greater than WRDA.L's maximum drawdown of -27.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAC.L and WRDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRAC.LWRDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.92%

-27.71%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.32%

-27.71%

+21.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.17%

-15.53%

+6.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-7.46%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

18.35%

-15.13%

Volatility

PRAC.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc (PRAC.L) is 1.99%, while UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that PRAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRAC.LWRDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

2.96%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

9.04%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

43.30%

-32.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.23%

29.74%

-18.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.77%

29.74%

-15.97%

PRAC.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAC.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRAC.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRAC.L nor WRDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PRAC.L and WRDA.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PRAC.L.

PRAC.L tracks Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PRAC.L and 0.06% for WRDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRAC.L and WRDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer