PRAC.L vs. AT1D.L
PRAC.L (Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and AT1D.L (Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds from Invesco - PRAC.L tracks the ICE BofA Diversified Core Plus Fixed Rate Preferred Securities Index while AT1D.L tracks the iBoxx USD Contingent Convertible Liquid Developed Market AT1 (8% Issuer Cap) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRAC.L returned -1.78%/yr vs 2.83%/yr for AT1D.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRAC.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for AT1D.L.
Performance
PRAC.L vs. AT1D.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PRAC.L is traded in USD, while AT1D.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AT1D.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRAC.L achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than AT1D.L's 1.90% return.
PRAC.L
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- 6M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 1Y
- 1.89%
- 3Y*
- 4.06%
- 5Y*
- -1.78%
- 10Y*
- —
AT1D.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 6.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.75%
- 5Y*
- 2.83%
- 10Y*
- —
PRAC.L vs. AT1D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRAC.L Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.94% | 2.50% | 4.73% | 9.42% | -21.50% | 2.76% | 5.68% | 18.13% | -1.07% |
AT1D.L Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.90% | 10.93% | 10.30% | 1.80% | -9.71% | 3.81% | 8.06% | 19.40% | 0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRAC.L and AT1D.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2018 | 0.27 |
The correlation between PRAC.L and AT1D.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRAC.L vs. AT1D.L — Risk / Return Rank
PRAC.L
AT1D.L
PRAC.L vs. AT1D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (PRAC.L) and Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (AT1D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRAC.L | AT1D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.21 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 1.84 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | 8.25 | -7.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRAC.L vs. AT1D.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRAC.L drawdown since its inception was -30.92%, smaller than the maximum AT1D.L drawdown of -36.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAC.L and AT1D.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRAC.L | AT1D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.92% | -36.00% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.32% | -3.81% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.52% | -4.39% | -8.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.91% | -25.05% | -0.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.48% | -0.97% | -8.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.28% | -9.14% | +0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 0.85% | +2.41% |
Volatility
PRAC.L vs. AT1D.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (PRAC.L) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (AT1D.L) at 1.59%. This indicates that PRAC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AT1D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRAC.L | AT1D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | 1.59% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.70% | 5.05% | +2.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.48% | 5.99% | +4.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.23% | 9.01% | +2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 14.15% | -0.39% |
PRAC.L vs. AT1D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRAC.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AT1D.L's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRAC.L vs. AT1D.L - Dividend Comparison
PRAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AT1D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AT1D.L Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist | 5.99% | 6.07% | 6.14% | 6.24% | 5.79% | 4.25% | 5.63% | 5.59% | 1.12% |
PRAC.L Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRAC.L and AT1D.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AT1D.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AT1D.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PRAC.L.
PRAC.L tracks ICE BofA Diversified Core Plus Fixed Rate Preferred Securities Index, while AT1D.L tracks iBoxx USD Contingent Convertible Liquid Developed Market AT1 (8% Issuer Cap) Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PRAC.L and 0.39% for AT1D.L.
Find the right allocation for PRAC.L and AT1D.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer