PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AT1D.L vs. USDC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AT1D.L vs. USDC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (AT1D.L) and L&G USD Corporate Bond Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (USDC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AT1D.L is traded in GBp, while USDC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the USDC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AT1D.L achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly higher than USDC.L's -2.21% return.


AT1D.L

1D
0.16%
1M
0.45%
6M
1.34%
YTD
2.72%
1Y
7.93%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*

USDC.L

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.97%
6M
-0.52%
YTD
-2.21%
1Y
1.76%
3Y*
3.34%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AT1D.L vs. USDC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AT1D.L
Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist
2.72%3.15%12.17%-3.30%1.10%5.27%
USDC.L
L&G USD Corporate Bond Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-2.21%-0.23%4.93%2.93%-3.67%-0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AT1D.L and USDC.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2021

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AT1D.L vs. USDC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AT1D.L
AT1D.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
AT1D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AT1D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AT1D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AT1D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AT1D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

USDC.L
USDC.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
USDC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
USDC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AT1D.L vs. USDC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (AT1D.L) and L&G USD Corporate Bond Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (USDC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AT1D.LUSDC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.04

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

0.24

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.82

0.52

+6.30

AT1D.L vs. USDC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AT1D.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the USDC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AT1D.L and USDC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AT1D.L vs. USDC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AT1D.L drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, which is greater than USDC.L's maximum drawdown of -13.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AT1D.L and USDC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AT1D.LUSDC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.40%

-13.86%

-13.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.35%

-7.37%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.14%

-8.93%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

-13.86%

-8.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-4.86%

+3.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-5.59%

-2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

3.39%

-2.20%

Volatility

AT1D.L vs. USDC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (AT1D.L) is 1.70%, while L&G USD Corporate Bond Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (USDC.L) has a volatility of 2.10%. This indicates that AT1D.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USDC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AT1D.LUSDC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

2.10%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.74%

5.82%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.49%

7.83%

-1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.88%

9.02%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

8.90%

+5.18%

AT1D.L vs. USDC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AT1D.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than USDC.L's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

AT1D.L vs. USDC.L - Dividend Comparison

AT1D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than USDC.L's 4.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AT1D.L
Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist
5.99%6.07%6.14%6.24%5.79%4.25%5.63%5.59%1.12%
USDC.L
L&G USD Corporate Bond Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.44%4.47%4.08%3.24%2.36%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AT1D.L and USDC.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USDC.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USDC.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for AT1D.L.

AT1D.L is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while USDC.L is Corporate Bonds. AT1D.L tracks iBoxx USD Contingent Convertible Liquid Developed Market AT1 (8% Issuer Cap) Index, while USDC.L tracks J.P. Morgan Global Credit Index ESG Investment Grade USD Custom Maturity Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for AT1D.L and 0.09% for USDC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AT1D.L and USDC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer