PRA vs. RPV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRA (ProAssurance Corporation) is a stock, while RPV (Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index. Over the past 10 years, PRA returned -4.40%/yr vs 10.64%/yr for RPV. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

PRA vs. RPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) and Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRA achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than RPV's 10.48% return. Over the past 10 years, PRA has underperformed RPV with an annualized return of -4.40%, while RPV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.64% annualized return.

PRA

• 1D: 1.83%
• 1M: -0.93%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 2.05%
• 1Y: 5.35%
• 3Y*: 24.12%
• 5Y*: 0.65%
• 10Y*: -4.40%

RPV

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 2.84%
• YTD: 10.48%
• 6M: 12.73%
• 1Y: 27.41%
• 3Y*: 18.14%
• 5Y*: 9.29%
• 10Y*: 10.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRA vs. RPV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRA ProAssurance Corporation	1.08%	51.85%	15.37%	-20.84%	-30.28%	43.40%	-49.70%	-7.90%	-25.92%	12.42%
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF	10.48%	17.70%	12.41%	7.98%	-1.27%	34.22%	-8.69%	24.80%	-12.31%	17.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PRA and RPV is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2006	0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between PRA and RPV has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PRA vs. RPV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRA

PRA Risk / Return Rank: 69
PRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
PRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
PRA Omega Ratio Rank: 66
PRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PRA Martin Ratio Rank: 80

RPV

RPV Risk / Return Rank: 66
RPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
RPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RPV Omega Ratio Rank: 61
RPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
RPV Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRA vs. RPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) and Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRA	RPV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	2.19	-1.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	3.17	-1.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.38	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	3.56	-2.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.59	12.45	-5.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRA vs. RPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRA Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the RPV Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRA and RPV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRA	RPV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	2.19	-1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	0.52	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.11	0.49	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.38	-0.13

Drawdowns

PRA vs. RPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRA drawdown since its inception was -78.83%, roughly equal to the maximum RPV drawdown of -75.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRA and RPV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRA	RPV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.83%	-75.32%	-3.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.76%	-7.74%	+3.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.68%	-15.50%	-27.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.82%	-22.64%	-37.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.83%	-50.67%	-28.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.54%	-0.60%	-51.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.05%	-10.69%	-12.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	2.21%	-1.39%

Volatility

PRA vs. RPV - Volatility Comparison

ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) at 2.54%. This indicates that PRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRA	RPV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	2.54%	+0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.83%	8.50%	-3.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.15%	12.63%	-6.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.68%	17.88%	+21.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.41%	21.92%	+16.49%

Dividends

PRA vs. RPV - Dividend Comparison

PRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRA ProAssurance Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.36%	1.14%	0.79%	2.59%	3.43%	4.29%	10.38%	10.55%	4.62%
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF	2.28%	2.50%	2.16%	2.38%	2.29%	1.92%	2.11%	2.28%	2.49%	1.73%	1.73%	2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRA and RPV in my portfolio?

PRA and RPV have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRA or RPV?

PRA has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to RPV (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRA dropped -78.83% vs RPV's -75.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.