PRA.TO vs. CEQT.TO

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

PRA.TO (Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund) and CEQT.TO (CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PRA.TO returned 17.58%/yr vs 21.65%/yr for CEQT.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRA.TO charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CEQT.TO.

Performance

PRA.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO) and CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRA.TO achieves a 26.15% return, which is significantly higher than CEQT.TO's 13.94% return.

PRA.TO

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 5.87%
• 6M: 15.04%
• YTD: 26.15%
• 1Y: 38.59%
• 3Y*: 17.58%
• 5Y*: 15.86%
• 10Y*: 10.51%
• ALL TIME*: 7.94%

CEQT.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.00%
• 6M: 10.12%
• YTD: 13.94%
• 1Y: 26.61%
• 3Y*: 21.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF	CA$11.36K	CA$11.26K	CA$17.10K
PRA.TO Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund	CA$227.74K	CA$395.74K	CA$474.14K

PRA.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PRA.TO Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund	26.15%	18.21%	8.78%	5.93%
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF	13.94%	18.84%	27.38%	6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PRA.TO and CEQT.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2023	0.17

Return for Risk

PRA.TO vs. CEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRA.TO

PRA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 95
PRA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PRA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PRA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PRA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PRA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

CEQT.TO

CEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 92
CEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRA.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO) and CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRA.TO	CEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.08	2.43	+0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.13	3.86	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.75	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.32	3.70	+2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.55	14.46	+6.09

PRA.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.08, which is comparable to the CEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRA.TO and CEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRA.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRA.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, which is greater than CEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRA.TO and CEQT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRA.TO	CEQT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.17%	-14.02%	-20.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.13%	-7.26%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.47%	-14.02%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-1.28%	+0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.57%	-1.17%	-6.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	1.85%	+0.03%

Volatility

PRA.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO) at 1.97%. This indicates that PRA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRA.TO	CEQT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	1.97%	+0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.46%	8.90%	+0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.60%	11.09%	+1.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.59%	12.98%	+0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.45%	12.98%	+1.47%

PRA.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRA.TO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than CEQT.TO's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRA.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

PRA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than CEQT.TO's 1.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF	1.09%	1.25%	1.82%	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRA.TO Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund	2.07%	3.23%	2.95%	3.12%	1.93%	1.25%	1.52%	1.57%	1.77%	1.93%	1.64%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRA.TO and CEQT.TO in my portfolio?

PRA.TO and CEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PRA.TO or CEQT.TO?

On fees, CEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRA.TO or CEQT.TO?

CEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for PRA.TO.

What is the main difference between PRA.TO and CEQT.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments Inc. and CI. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for PRA.TO and 0.30% for CEQT.TO.