PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PR1Z.DE vs. DBXS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PR1Z.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE) and Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) (DBXS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PR1Z.DE achieves a 11.77% return, which is significantly higher than DBXS.DE's 9.48% return.


PR1Z.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.08%
6M
7.42%
YTD
11.77%
1Y
23.29%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*

DBXS.DE

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.26%
6M
8.21%
YTD
9.48%
1Y
22.11%
3Y*
12.06%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
9.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PR1Z.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PR1Z.DE
Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D)
11.77%24.78%9.45%19.41%-12.44%27.38%-4.63%22.47%
DBXS.DE
Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist)
9.48%19.12%3.77%10.63%-11.87%28.73%1.61%28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PR1Z.DE and DBXS.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2019

0.50

The correlation between PR1Z.DE and DBXS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PR1Z.DE vs. DBXS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PR1Z.DE
PR1Z.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
PR1Z.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1Z.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1Z.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1Z.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1Z.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DBXS.DE
DBXS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DBXS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PR1Z.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE) and Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) (DBXS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PR1Z.DEDBXS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

1.83

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.43

6.28

+2.15

PR1Z.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PR1Z.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the DBXS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PR1Z.DE and DBXS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PR1Z.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PR1Z.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.55%, smaller than the maximum DBXS.DE drawdown of -48.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR1Z.DE and DBXS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PR1Z.DEDBXS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.55%

-48.29%

+8.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.31%

-12.05%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.67%

-14.48%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.21%

-17.19%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-2.00%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-8.72%

+3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

3.51%

-0.75%

Volatility

PR1Z.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) (DBXS.DE) at 3.71%. This indicates that PR1Z.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBXS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PR1Z.DEDBXS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

3.71%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

10.91%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.77%

13.79%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

13.40%

+2.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

13.99%

+4.66%

PR1Z.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PR1Z.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DBXS.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PR1Z.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Dividend Comparison

PR1Z.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than DBXS.DE's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBXS.DE
Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.39%1.52%1.63%1.76%3.25%1.20%1.59%1.21%2.35%1.32%1.06%1.25%
PR1Z.DE
Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D)
2.26%2.53%2.77%2.80%3.09%1.83%2.11%2.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PR1Z.DE and DBXS.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PR1Z.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1Z.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DBXS.DE.

PR1Z.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Eurozone Large & Mid Cap, while DBXS.DE tracks Solactive Swiss Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PR1Z.DE and 0.30% for DBXS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PR1Z.DE and DBXS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer