DBXS.DE vs. XB4A.DE
DBXS.DE (Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist)) and XB4A.DE (Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds from Xtrackers - DBXS.DE tracks the Solactive Swiss Large Cap Index while XB4A.DE tracks the ATX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBXS.DE returned 9.86%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for XB4A.DE. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBXS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XB4A.DE.
Performance
DBXS.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBXS.DE achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly lower than XB4A.DE's 26.47% return. Over the past 10 years, DBXS.DE has underperformed XB4A.DE with an annualized return of 9.86%, while XB4A.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.98% annualized return.
DBXS.DE
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- YTD
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 24.84%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
XB4A.DE
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 25.41%
- YTD
- 26.47%
- 1Y
- 51.75%
- 3Y*
- 31.70%
- 5Y*
- 17.96%
- 10Y*
- 15.98%
DBXS.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXS.DE Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) | 11.71% | 19.12% | 3.77% | 10.63% | -11.87% | 28.73% | 1.61% | 35.45% | -4.24% | 7.02% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 26.47% | 51.29% | 11.01% | 14.27% | -16.45% | 42.39% | -10.86% | 19.79% | -17.99% | 32.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBXS.DE and XB4A.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2011 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBXS.DE vs. XB4A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBXS.DE
XB4A.DE
DBXS.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) (DBXS.DE) and Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBXS.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.50 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 4.73 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 16.12 | -9.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBXS.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBXS.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.29%, smaller than the maximum XB4A.DE drawdown of -53.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXS.DE and XB4A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBXS.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.29% | -53.54% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -10.88% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.48% | -16.26% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.19% | -32.50% | +15.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.14% | -53.54% | +28.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.54% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -9.90% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 3.20% | +0.31% |
Volatility
DBXS.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) (DBXS.DE) is 3.96%, while Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that DBXS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XB4A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBXS.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 6.08% | -2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | 14.73% | -3.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.80% | 17.53% | -3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.38% | 19.15% | -5.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 20.21% | -6.22% |
DBXS.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBXS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XB4A.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBXS.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Dividend Comparison
DBXS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, while XB4A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXS.DE Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 3.25% | 1.20% | 1.59% | 1.21% | 2.35% | 1.32% | 1.06% | 1.25% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBXS.DE and XB4A.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XB4A.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XB4A.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DBXS.DE.
DBXS.DE tracks Solactive Swiss Large Cap Index, while XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DBXS.DE and 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBXS.DE and XB4A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer