PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PR1J.DE vs. BATG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PR1J.DE vs. BATG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) and L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PR1J.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
3.47%
YTD
15.82%
6M
16.06%
1Y
30.46%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*

BATG.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PR1J.DE vs. BATG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PR1J.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)
15.82%12.92%13.38%16.35%2.18%
BATG.DE
L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF
0.00%5.88%12.80%12.76%1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between PR1J.DE and BATG.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022

0.70

The correlation between PR1J.DE and BATG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PR1J.DE vs. BATG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PR1J.DE
PR1J.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PR1J.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

BATG.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PR1J.DE vs. BATG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) and L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PR1J.DEBATG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.22

PR1J.DE vs. BATG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PR1J.DEBATG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

Drawdowns

PR1J.DE vs. BATG.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PR1J.DEBATG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

Volatility

PR1J.DE vs. BATG.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PR1J.DEBATG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

PR1J.DE vs. BATG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PR1J.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BATG.DE's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PR1J.DE vs. BATG.DE - Dividend Comparison

PR1J.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while BATG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BATG.DE
L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PR1J.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)
1.51%1.75%1.91%1.90%2.21%1.79%1.73%1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


PR1J.DE and BATG.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PR1J.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1J.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for BATG.DE.

PR1J.DE tracks Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap, while BATG.DE tracks Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Japan. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PR1J.DE and 0.16% for BATG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PR1J.DE and BATG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer