PR1H.DE vs. CEMF.DE
PR1H.DE (Amundi US Treasury Bond 0-1Y UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc) and CEMF.DE (iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - PR1H.DE is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Amundi, while CEMF.DE is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year (EUR Hedged) Index. PR1H.DE is actively managed, while CEMF.DE is passively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PR1H.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CEMF.DE.
Performance
PR1H.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PR1H.DE achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly higher than CEMF.DE's -1.42% return.
PR1H.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 1.76%
- 3Y*
- 2.76%
- 5Y*
- 1.41%
- 10Y*
- —
CEMF.DE
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 6M
- -1.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PR1H.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PR1H.DE Amundi US Treasury Bond 0-1Y UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc | 0.69% | 0.87% |
CEMF.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc | -1.42% | 2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between PR1H.DE and CEMF.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PR1H.DE vs. CEMF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PR1H.DE
CEMF.DE
PR1H.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi US Treasury Bond 0-1Y UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (PR1H.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PR1H.DE | CEMF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.86 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 68.95 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PR1H.DE | CEMF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 0.29 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
PR1H.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PR1H.DE drawdown since its inception was -2.84%, smaller than the maximum CEMF.DE drawdown of -4.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR1H.DE and CEMF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PR1H.DE | CEMF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -4.45% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -2.97% | +2.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -1.20% | +0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | — | — |
Volatility
PR1H.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PR1H.DE | CEMF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45% | 4.62% | -4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.90% | 4.62% | -3.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.89% | 4.62% | -3.73% |
PR1H.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PR1H.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMF.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PR1H.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither PR1H.DE nor CEMF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PR1H.DE and CEMF.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PR1H.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PR1H.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CEMF.DE.
PR1H.DE is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while CEMF.DE is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for PR1H.DE and 0.10% for CEMF.DE.
Find the right allocation for PR1H.DE and CEMF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer