PQVM.L vs. S5EE.L
PQVM.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) and S5EE.L (UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc) are both S&P 500 funds - PQVM.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index while S5EE.L tracks the S&P 500 Elite ESG Index USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PQVM.L returned 15.45%/yr vs 14.73%/yr for S5EE.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PQVM.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for S5EE.L.
Performance
PQVM.L vs. S5EE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PQVM.L is traded in USD, while S5EE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the S5EE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQVM.L achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly lower than S5EE.L's 19.95% return.
PQVM.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 6M
- 17.79%
- 1Y
- 22.76%
- 3Y*
- 24.37%
- 5Y*
- 15.45%
- 10Y*
- —
S5EE.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 19.95%
- 6M
- 23.16%
- 1Y
- 41.93%
- 3Y*
- 24.45%
- 5Y*
- 14.73%
- 10Y*
- —
PQVM.L vs. S5EE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 16.65% | 13.66% | 30.17% | 6.82% | 0.52% | 22.25% |
S5EE.L UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc | 19.95% | 20.10% | 18.01% | 28.57% | -19.18% | 24.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between PQVM.L and S5EE.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between PQVM.L and S5EE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PQVM.L vs. S5EE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PQVM.L
S5EE.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
PQVM.L
S5EE.L
Financial Services
PQVM.L
S5EE.L
Industrials
PQVM.L
S5EE.L
Healthcare
PQVM.L
S5EE.L
Communication Services
PQVM.L
S5EE.L
Energy
PQVM.L
S5EE.L
-
Consumer Defensive
PQVM.L
S5EE.L
Consumer Cyclical
PQVM.L
S5EE.L
Utilities
PQVM.L
S5EE.L
-
Basic Materials
PQVM.L
S5EE.L
Real Estate
PQVM.L
-
S5EE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PQVM.L vs. S5EE.L — Risk / Return Rank
PQVM.L
S5EE.L
PQVM.L vs. S5EE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) and UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQVM.L | S5EE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.58 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.70 | 3.89 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.26 | 16.41 | -0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQVM.L | S5EE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 3.32 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.91 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 1.02 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
PQVM.L vs. S5EE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQVM.L drawdown since its inception was -34.42%, which is greater than S5EE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQVM.L and S5EE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQVM.L | S5EE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.42% | -27.69% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.83% | -10.73% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.49% | -18.29% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.35% | -27.69% | +10.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.05% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -5.74% | +1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 2.55% | -1.15% |
Volatility
PQVM.L vs. S5EE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) is 3.15%, while UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that PQVM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than S5EE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PQVM.L | S5EE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 3.84% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.76% | 9.68% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.01% | 12.56% | -1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 16.15% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 16.00% | +1.13% |
PQVM.L vs. S5EE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQVM.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than S5EE.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PQVM.L vs. S5EE.L - Dividend Comparison
PQVM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while S5EE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 0.77% | 0.82% | 0.84% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 0.89% | 1.48% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 0.71% |
S5EE.L UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PQVM.L and S5EE.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, S5EE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
S5EE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVM.L.
PQVM.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index, while S5EE.L tracks S&P 500 Elite ESG Index USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PQVM.L and 0.15% for S5EE.L.
Find the right allocation for PQVM.L and S5EE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer