PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQTIX vs. AHLPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQTIX vs. AHLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (PQTIX) and American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQTIX achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly lower than AHLPX's 10.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PQTIX has underperformed AHLPX with an annualized return of 4.03%, while AHLPX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.52% annualized return.


PQTIX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.09%
6M
2.04%
YTD
4.24%
1Y
15.59%
3Y*
0.19%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*
4.03%

AHLPX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.19%
6M
5.63%
YTD
10.73%
1Y
24.66%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
4.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQTIX vs. AHLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQTIX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class
4.24%2.39%-2.88%-4.19%11.62%14.87%9.96%2.90%2.37%2.37%
AHLPX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund
10.73%2.19%1.74%-4.20%16.48%4.67%10.36%0.09%2.15%4.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PQTIX and AHLPX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.79

The correlation between PQTIX and AHLPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQTIX vs. AHLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQTIX
PQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

AHLPX
AHLPX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AHLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
AHLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQTIX vs. AHLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (PQTIX) and American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PQTIXAHLPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.41

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

4.93

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.83

15.01

-6.18

PQTIX vs. AHLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQTIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the AHLPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQTIX and AHLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PQTIX vs. AHLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQTIX drawdown since its inception was -27.65%, which is greater than AHLPX's maximum drawdown of -21.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQTIX and AHLPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQTIXAHLPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.65%

-21.90%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.63%

-5.02%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.59%

-21.90%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.65%

-21.90%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.65%

-21.90%

-5.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.75%

-1.71%

-11.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-6.73%

-2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.65%

+0.11%

Volatility

PQTIX vs. AHLPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (PQTIX) is 2.30%, while American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) has a volatility of 2.58%. This indicates that PQTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AHLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQTIXAHLPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

2.58%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.68%

7.29%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.62%

10.90%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.91%

9.65%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.31%

9.53%

-0.22%

PQTIX vs. AHLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQTIX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is lower than AHLPX's 1.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQTIX vs. AHLPX - Dividend Comparison

PQTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than AHLPX's 7.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHLPX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund
7.29%8.07%0.29%0.63%17.64%7.15%5.14%4.17%1.45%4.07%0.00%3.40%
PQTIX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class
1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.83%2.47%5.65%2.55%0.39%0.25%0.00%8.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


PQTIX and AHLPX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AHLPX has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to PQTIX (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQTIX dropped -27.65% vs AHLPX's -21.90%.

AHLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQTIX and AHLPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer