PQTAX vs. QMHNX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX).
PQTAX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 31, 2013. QMHNX is an actively managed fund by AQR. It was launched on Jul 16, 2013.
Performance
PQTAX vs. QMHNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PQTAX vs. QMHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQTAX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A | 3.74% | 2.06% | -3.31% | -4.52% | 11.06% | 14.52% | 8.48% | 2.63% | 1.98% | 4.51% |
QMHNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N | 13.82% | 19.65% | 10.48% | -0.40% | 49.64% | -2.30% | -0.85% | 1.55% | -14.59% | -2.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQTAX achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly lower than QMHNX's 13.82% return. Over the past 10 years, PQTAX has underperformed QMHNX with an annualized return of 3.55%, while QMHNX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.69% annualized return.
PQTAX
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- YTD
- 3.74%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 10.99%
- 3Y*
- 1.49%
- 5Y*
- 3.76%
- 10Y*
- 3.55%
QMHNX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 13.82%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- 1Y
- 25.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.50%
- 5Y*
- 16.03%
- 10Y*
- 4.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PQTAX vs. QMHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQTAX has a 1.81% expense ratio, which is lower than QMHNX's 4.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PQTAX vs. QMHNX — Risk / Return Rank
PQTAX
QMHNX
PQTAX vs. QMHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQTAX | QMHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 1.89 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 2.32 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.34 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 3.27 | -1.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.24 | 8.68 | -5.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQTAX | QMHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.89 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.94 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.30 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.35 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between PQTAX and QMHNX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PQTAX vs. QMHNX - Dividend Comparison
PQTAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QMHNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQTAX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.61% | 2.22% | 4.46% | 2.29% | 0.10% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 7.65% |
QMHNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N | 1.66% | 1.89% | 2.09% | 7.36% | 8.75% | 10.64% | 7.79% | 3.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 7.47% |
Drawdowns
PQTAX vs. QMHNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQTAX drawdown since its inception was -28.39%, smaller than the maximum QMHNX drawdown of -40.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQTAX and QMHNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQTAX | QMHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.39% | -40.29% | +11.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -8.40% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.39% | -19.23% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.39% | -35.34% | +6.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.28% | -1.23% | -13.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.31% | -18.52% | +9.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 3.16% | +0.20% |
Volatility
PQTAX vs. QMHNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX) is 3.59%, while AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that PQTAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PQTAX | QMHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 4.04% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.78% | 9.99% | -3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.82% | 14.17% | -5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.90% | 17.22% | -7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.42% | 15.46% | -6.04% |