DRGTX vs. PRGTX

In the year-to-date period, DRGTX achieves a -19.56% return, which is significantly lower than PRGTX's -16.78% return. Over the past 10 years, DRGTX has underperformed PRGTX with an annualized return of 1.53%, while PRGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.62% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

DRGTX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than PRGTX's 0.95% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Technology Fund (DRGTX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current DRGTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the PRGTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRGTX and PRGTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither DRGTX nor PRGTX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum DRGTX drawdown since its inception was -83.33%, which is greater than PRGTX's maximum drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGTX and PRGTX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Virtus Technology Fund (DRGTX) has a higher volatility of 19.69% compared to T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) at 17.90%. This indicates that DRGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.