PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQDMX vs. DCINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQDMX vs. DCINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions International Developed Markets Index Fund (PQDMX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQDMX achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than DCINX's 26.35% return.


PQDMX

1D
0.33%
1M
4.14%
YTD
9.29%
6M
11.75%
1Y
21.94%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*

DCINX

1D
1.10%
1M
9.28%
YTD
26.35%
6M
30.17%
1Y
54.52%
3Y*
29.16%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQDMX vs. DCINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQDMX
PGIM Quant Solutions International Developed Markets Index Fund
9.29%31.21%2.93%17.76%-15.26%9.28%10.24%21.11%-13.70%24.61%
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
26.35%46.37%7.65%15.98%-14.67%9.70%19.86%18.14%-14.27%23.58%

Correlation

The correlation between PQDMX and DCINX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.90

The correlation between PQDMX and DCINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQDMX vs. DCINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQDMX
PQDMX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PQDMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQDMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQDMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
PQDMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQDMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

DCINX
DCINX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DCINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DCINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQDMX vs. DCINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions International Developed Markets Index Fund (PQDMX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PQDMXDCINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.61

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

4.61

-2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.92

18.49

-11.57

PQDMX vs. DCINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQDMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the DCINX Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQDMX and DCINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PQDMXDCINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

3.46

-2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.92

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.35

+0.23

Drawdowns

PQDMX vs. DCINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQDMX drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, smaller than the maximum DCINX drawdown of -61.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQDMX and DCINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQDMXDCINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.63%

-61.79%

+27.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-11.91%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-13.74%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.45%

-31.18%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

0.00%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-12.85%

+5.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.96%

+0.08%

Volatility

PQDMX vs. DCINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Quant Solutions International Developed Markets Index Fund (PQDMX) is 4.70%, while Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that PQDMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQDMXDCINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

5.53%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

13.47%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

15.89%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

15.40%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.15%

16.53%

-0.38%

PQDMX vs. DCINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQDMX has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than DCINX's 2.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQDMX vs. DCINX - Dividend Comparison

PQDMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than DCINX's 8.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
8.66%10.95%13.87%3.45%3.53%15.49%1.36%1.54%6.92%3.92%
PQDMX
PGIM Quant Solutions International Developed Markets Index Fund
3.13%3.42%4.76%3.00%2.45%3.31%1.54%2.63%2.66%2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


PQDMX and DCINX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCINX has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to PQDMX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQDMX dropped -34.63% vs DCINX's -61.79%.

DCINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQDMX and DCINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer