PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPQZX vs. PCRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPQZX vs. PCRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RealPath Blend 2050 Fund (PPQZX) and PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPQZX achieves a 12.28% return, which is significantly lower than PCRIX's 26.86% return. Over the past 10 years, PPQZX has outperformed PCRIX with an annualized return of 11.63%, while PCRIX has yielded a comparatively lower -2.66% annualized return.


PPQZX

1D
0.34%
1M
4.93%
YTD
12.28%
6M
13.13%
1Y
27.90%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
11.63%

PCRIX

1D
0.38%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
26.86%
6M
23.71%
1Y
39.70%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
-9.52%
10Y*
-2.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPQZX vs. PCRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPQZX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2050 Fund
12.28%20.62%13.93%19.69%-17.27%18.50%13.70%25.09%-7.75%19.88%
PCRIX
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund
26.86%17.05%10.59%-68.64%8.94%33.35%0.79%12.29%-13.77%2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PPQZX and PCRIX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between PPQZX and PCRIX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPQZX vs. PCRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPQZX
PPQZX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PPQZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPQZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPQZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PPQZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPQZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

PCRIX
PCRIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PCRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PCRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPQZX vs. PCRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2050 Fund (PPQZX) and PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPQZXPCRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.44

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

5.66

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.65

17.68

-3.04

PPQZX vs. PCRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPQZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the PCRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPQZX and PCRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPQZXPCRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.48

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

-0.27

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

-0.10

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

-0.11

+0.81

Drawdowns

PPQZX vs. PCRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPQZX drawdown since its inception was -31.59%, smaller than the maximum PCRIX drawdown of -88.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPQZX and PCRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPQZXPCRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.59%

-88.17%

+56.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-7.12%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-10.28%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.57%

-78.15%

+52.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.59%

-78.15%

+46.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-79.68%

+79.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-51.80%

+47.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

2.27%

-0.34%

Volatility

PPQZX vs. PCRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2050 Fund (PPQZX) is 3.28%, while PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that PPQZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPQZXPCRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

5.27%

-1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

14.12%

-5.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.95%

16.32%

-5.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

35.79%

-21.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.80%

27.19%

-12.39%

PPQZX vs. PCRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPQZX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than PCRIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPQZX vs. PCRIX - Dividend Comparison

PPQZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than PCRIX's 4.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCRIX
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund
4.00%5.61%8.34%16.19%46.23%22.74%1.56%4.00%5.94%8.14%0.91%5.29%
PPQZX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2050 Fund
3.55%3.82%4.55%2.29%2.43%5.31%1.28%3.79%6.75%2.09%2.40%2.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPQZX and PCRIX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCRIX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to PPQZX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPQZX dropped -31.59% vs PCRIX's -88.17%.

PPQZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPQZX and PCRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer