PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPQZX vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPQZX vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RealPath Blend 2050 Fund (PPQZX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPQZX achieves a 12.28% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PPQZX has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 11.63%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


PPQZX

1D
0.34%
1M
4.93%
YTD
12.28%
6M
13.13%
1Y
27.90%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
11.63%

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.01%
6M
18.63%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPQZX vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPQZX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2050 Fund
12.28%20.62%13.93%19.69%-17.27%18.50%13.70%25.09%-7.75%19.88%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PPQZX and SCHD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between PPQZX and SCHD has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPQZX vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPQZX
PPQZX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PPQZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPQZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPQZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PPQZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPQZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPQZX vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2050 Fund (PPQZX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPQZXSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.45

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

5.91

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.65

14.53

+0.12

PPQZX vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPQZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPQZX and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPQZXSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.49

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.58

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.77

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.86

-0.16

Drawdowns

PPQZX vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPQZX drawdown since its inception was -31.59%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPQZX and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPQZXSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.59%

-33.37%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-4.61%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-16.13%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.57%

-16.85%

-8.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.59%

-33.37%

+1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.40%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-3.32%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.88%

+0.05%

Volatility

PPQZX vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2050 Fund (PPQZX) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that PPQZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPQZXSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

2.66%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

7.66%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.95%

10.96%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

14.38%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.80%

16.72%

-1.92%

PPQZX vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PPQZX and SCHD have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PPQZX vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

PPQZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPQZX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2050 Fund
3.55%3.82%4.55%2.29%2.43%5.31%1.28%3.79%6.75%2.09%2.40%2.19%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPQZX and SCHD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPQZX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPQZX dropped -31.59% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

PPQZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPQZX and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer