PPLT vs. SVR.TO
PPLT (abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF) and SVR.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPLT is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Platinum Price PM, while SVR.TO is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PPLT returned 3.32%/yr vs 8.82%/yr for SVR.TO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PPLT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SVR.TO.
Performance
PPLT vs. SVR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PPLT is traded in USD, while SVR.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SVR.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPLT achieves a -24.21% return, which is significantly lower than SVR.TO's -21.46% return. Over the past 10 years, PPLT has underperformed SVR.TO with an annualized return of 3.32%, while SVR.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.82% annualized return.
PPLT
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -19.03%
- YTD
- -24.21%
- 6M
- -28.86%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 3.32%
SVR.TO
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- -24.99%
- YTD
- -21.46%
- 6M
- -26.42%
- 1Y
- 51.15%
- 3Y*
- 31.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.82%
PPLT vs. SVR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPLT abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -24.21% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -10.75% | 10.78% | 20.85% | -14.95% | 2.38% |
SVR.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF | -21.46% | 152.07% | 9.45% | 1.48% | -5.88% | -12.98% | 46.44% | 17.62% | -16.52% | 11.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPLT and SVR.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2010 | 0.57 |
The correlation between PPLT and SVR.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (10 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPLT vs. SVR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PPLT
SVR.TO
PPLT vs. SVR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPLT | SVR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.20 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 0.95 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.78 | 2.14 | -1.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPLT vs. SVR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPLT drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, smaller than the maximum SVR.TO drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLT and SVR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPLT | SVR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -85.22% | +14.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.98% | -54.20% | +10.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.98% | -54.20% | +10.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.98% | -54.20% | +10.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.14% | -54.20% | +3.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.98% | -52.24% | +8.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.94% | -59.57% | +19.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.30% | 23.98% | -4.68% |
Volatility
PPLT vs. SVR.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) is 12.58%, while iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR.TO) has a volatility of 16.52%. This indicates that PPLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPLT | SVR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.58% | 16.52% | -3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.67% | 57.96% | -14.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.52% | 60.36% | -9.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.78% | 37.53% | -4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.21% | 33.40% | -4.19% |
PPLT vs. SVR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPLT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SVR.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPLT vs. SVR.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither PPLT nor SVR.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PPLT and SVR.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PPLT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PPLT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SVR.TO.
PPLT is categorized as Precious Metals, while SVR.TO is Silver. PPLT tracks LBMA Platinum Price PM, while SVR.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PPLT and 0.66% for SVR.TO.
Find the right allocation for PPLT and SVR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer