PPLT vs. CPNG
PPLT (Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF) is Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while CPNG (Coupang, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, PPLT returned 7.65%/yr vs -15.31%/yr for CPNG. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PPLT vs. CPNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPLT achieves a -16.64% return, which is significantly higher than CPNG's -28.70% return.
PPLT
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -13.20%
- YTD
- -16.64%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 38.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
CPNG
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- -28.70%
- 6M
- -34.37%
- 1Y
- -40.14%
- 3Y*
- 0.44%
- 5Y*
- -15.31%
- 10Y*
- —
PPLT vs. CPNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -16.64% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -20.23% |
CPNG Coupang, Inc. | -28.70% | 7.32% | 35.76% | 10.06% | -49.93% | -53.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPLT and CPNG is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2021 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPLT vs. CPNG — Risk / Return Rank
PPLT
CPNG
PPLT vs. CPNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and Coupang, Inc. (CPNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPLT | CPNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.83 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | -0.74 | +1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | -1.32 | +3.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPLT vs. CPNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPLT drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, smaller than the maximum CPNG drawdown of -85.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLT and CPNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPLT | CPNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -85.28% | +14.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.02% | -54.91% | +14.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.02% | -54.91% | +14.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.02% | -79.01% | +38.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.39% | -73.51% | +35.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.94% | -64.19% | +24.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.37% | 30.85% | -13.48% |
Volatility
PPLT vs. CPNG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) is 11.07%, while Coupang, Inc. (CPNG) has a volatility of 21.03%. This indicates that PPLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPLT | CPNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.07% | 21.03% | -9.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.24% | 39.57% | +5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.99% | 44.14% | +6.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.68% | 52.50% | -19.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.10% | 53.74% | -24.64% |
Dividends
PPLT vs. CPNG - Dividend Comparison
Neither PPLT nor CPNG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PPLT and CPNG have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CPNG has higher volatility (21.03%) compared to PPLT (11.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPLT dropped -70.73% vs CPNG's -85.28%.
PPLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPLT and CPNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer