PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPLN.TO vs. XDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPLN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF (PPLN.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPLN.TO achieves a 29.04% return, which is significantly higher than XDIV.TO's 19.17% return.


PPLN.TO

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.16%
YTD
29.04%
6M
28.59%
1Y
39.15%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*
10.87%

XDIV.TO

1D
0.19%
1M
3.65%
YTD
19.17%
6M
18.94%
1Y
38.61%
3Y*
22.97%
5Y*
16.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPLN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPLN.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF
29.04%4.14%17.18%8.45%16.63%33.83%-17.80%20.50%-11.54%-3.55%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF
19.17%24.92%19.56%11.71%0.29%32.25%-7.81%24.84%-10.04%8.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PPLN.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.54

The correlation between PPLN.TO and XDIV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPLN.TO vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPLN.TO
PPLN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PPLN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPLN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPLN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PPLN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPLN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

XDIV.TO
XDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPLN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF (PPLN.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPLN.TOXDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

2.03

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

16.64

-12.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

56.55

-46.29

PPLN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPLN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is lower than the XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPLN.TO and XDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPLN.TOXDIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

4.94

-2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

1.57

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.81

-0.47

Drawdowns

PPLN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPLN.TO drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than XDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLN.TO and XDIV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPLN.TOXDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-41.30%

-17.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.22%

-2.33%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.31%

-10.53%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.54%

-17.60%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

-0.09%

-2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.47%

-4.25%

-5.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

0.69%

+3.15%

Volatility

PPLN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF (PPLN.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) at 2.81%. This indicates that PPLN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPLN.TOXDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

2.81%

+2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

6.36%

+5.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

7.85%

+6.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

10.53%

+6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.20%

16.01%

+7.19%

PPLN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPLN.TO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPLN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

PPLN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than XDIV.TO's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPLN.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF
4.26%4.35%2.94%3.77%3.23%3.47%5.76%4.40%5.21%4.31%3.99%4.41%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF
3.28%3.81%4.29%4.20%3.95%3.58%4.58%4.02%4.85%1.82%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPLN.TO and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for PPLN.TO.

PPLN.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. PPLN.TO tracks Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index, while XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for PPLN.TO and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPLN.TO and XDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer