PPLN.TO vs. NNRG.NEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PPLN.TO (Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF) and NNRG.NEO (Ninepoint Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - PPLN.TO tracks the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index while NNRG.NEO tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PPLN.TO returned 14.07%/yr vs 33.81%/yr for NNRG.NEO. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PPLN.TO charges 0.31%/yr vs 1.79%/yr for NNRG.NEO.

Performance

PPLN.TO vs. NNRG.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF (PPLN.TO) and Ninepoint Energy ETF (NNRG.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPLN.TO achieves a 29.04% return, which is significantly lower than NNRG.NEO's 45.59% return.

PPLN.TO

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 29.04%
• 6M: 28.59%
• 1Y: 39.15%
• 3Y*: 18.78%
• 5Y*: 14.07%
• 10Y*: 10.87%

NNRG.NEO

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: 45.59%
• 6M: 38.09%
• 1Y: 66.96%
• 3Y*: 26.11%
• 5Y*: 33.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPLN.TO vs. NNRG.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PPLN.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF	29.04%	4.14%	17.18%	8.45%	16.63%	3.92%
NNRG.NEO Ninepoint Energy ETF	45.59%	19.14%	13.26%	-4.21%	66.18%	55.91%

Correlation

The correlation between PPLN.TO and NNRG.NEO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2021	0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between PPLN.TO and NNRG.NEO has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PPLN.TO vs. NNRG.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPLN.TO

PPLN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 77
PPLN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
PPLN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PPLN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PPLN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
PPLN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

NNRG.NEO

NNRG.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 79
NNRG.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
NNRG.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
NNRG.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 75
NNRG.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
NNRG.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPLN.TO vs. NNRG.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF (PPLN.TO) and Ninepoint Energy ETF (NNRG.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PPLN.TO	NNRG.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	2.74	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	3.29	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.45	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.85	6.21	-2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.25	13.09	-2.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PPLN.TO vs. NNRG.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPLN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the NNRG.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPLN.TO and NNRG.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PPLN.TO	NNRG.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	2.74	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.98	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	1.07	-0.74

Drawdowns

PPLN.TO vs. NNRG.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPLN.TO drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than NNRG.NEO's maximum drawdown of -35.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLN.TO and NNRG.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PPLN.TO	NNRG.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.05%	-35.78%	-23.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.22%	-10.84%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.31%	-23.52%	+8.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.54%	-35.78%	+17.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.93%	-4.70%	+1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.47%	-9.58%	+0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.84%	5.13%	-1.29%

Volatility

PPLN.TO vs. NNRG.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF (PPLN.TO) is 5.77%, while Ninepoint Energy ETF (NNRG.NEO) has a volatility of 10.24%. This indicates that PPLN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NNRG.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PPLN.TO	NNRG.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.77%	10.24%	-4.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.56%	20.69%	-9.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.40%	24.53%	-10.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.40%	34.60%	-17.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.20%	34.56%	-11.36%

PPLN.TO vs. NNRG.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPLN.TO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than NNRG.NEO's 1.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

PPLN.TO vs. NNRG.NEO - Dividend Comparison

PPLN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than NNRG.NEO's 0.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NNRG.NEO Ninepoint Energy ETF	0.51%	0.37%	0.39%	0.38%	9.08%	1.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PPLN.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF	4.26%	4.35%	2.94%	3.77%	3.23%	3.47%	5.76%	4.40%	5.21%	4.31%	3.99%	4.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PPLN.TO and NNRG.NEO in my portfolio?

PPLN.TO and NNRG.NEO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PPLN.TO or NNRG.NEO?

On fees, PPLN.TO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PPLN.TO or NNRG.NEO?

PPLN.TO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 1.79% for NNRG.NEO.

What is the main difference between PPLN.TO and NNRG.NEO?

PPLN.TO tracks Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index, while NNRG.NEO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Ninepoint. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for PPLN.TO and 1.79% for NNRG.NEO.