PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPLIX vs. JLKYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPLIX vs. JLKYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPLIX achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly lower than JLKYX's 12.40% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PPLIX having a 11.56% annualized return and JLKYX not far ahead at 11.57%.


PPLIX

1D
0.66%
1M
3.90%
YTD
9.01%
6M
9.80%
1Y
22.37%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
11.56%

JLKYX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.58%
YTD
12.40%
6M
13.66%
1Y
28.90%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
11.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPLIX vs. JLKYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPLIX
Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund
9.01%17.55%19.12%20.36%-18.78%17.04%16.56%26.67%-8.74%22.12%
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
12.40%20.04%15.41%18.53%-18.04%18.38%16.13%25.07%-8.32%17.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PPLIX and JLKYX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014

0.98

The correlation between PPLIX and JLKYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPLIX vs. JLKYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPLIX
PPLIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PPLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PPLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

JLKYX
JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPLIX vs. JLKYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPLIXJLKYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

2.47

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.81

3.38

-0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.45

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

3.22

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.02

14.31

-2.30

PPLIX vs. JLKYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the JLKYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPLIX and JLKYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPLIXJLKYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.47

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.66

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.72

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.65

-0.19

Drawdowns

PPLIX vs. JLKYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPLIX drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, which is greater than JLKYX's maximum drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLIX and JLKYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPLIXJLKYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.61%

-32.55%

-23.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-9.16%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.59%

-16.11%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.85%

-25.75%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

-32.55%

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.31%

-4.66%

-3.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.06%

-0.16%

Volatility

PPLIX vs. JLKYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX) is 3.26%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) has a volatility of 3.55%. This indicates that PPLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLKYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPLIXJLKYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

3.55%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

9.59%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

12.07%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

15.21%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

16.21%

-0.62%

PPLIX vs. JLKYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PPLIX and JLKYX have an expense ratio of 0.01%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PPLIX vs. JLKYX - Dividend Comparison

PPLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.13%, more than JLKYX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
3.21%3.61%1.77%2.16%8.08%5.71%3.88%8.54%10.69%4.33%3.23%1.75%
PPLIX
Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund
9.13%9.95%11.56%4.41%9.40%8.04%5.23%7.16%8.64%5.12%4.82%6.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, PPLIX and JLKYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JLKYX has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to PPLIX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPLIX dropped -55.61% vs JLKYX's -32.55%.

JLKYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPLIX and JLKYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer