PPL.TO vs. DXMO.TO
PPL.TO (Pembina Pipeline Corporation) is a stock, while DXMO.TO (Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF) is Materials fund actively managed by Dynamic. Over the past year, PPL.TO returned 39.38% vs 68.77% for DXMO.TO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PPL.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPL.TO achieves a 32.40% return, which is significantly higher than DXMO.TO's 11.61% return.
PPL.TO
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 32.40%
- 6M
- 28.13%
- 1Y
- 39.38%
- 3Y*
- 24.86%
- 5Y*
- 20.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
DXMO.TO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 11.61%
- 6M
- 18.32%
- 1Y
- 68.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPL.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PPL.TO Pembina Pipeline Corporation | 32.40% | 3.76% | 7.02% |
DXMO.TO Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF | 11.61% | 88.43% | -9.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPL.TO and DXMO.TO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2024 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPL.TO vs. DXMO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PPL.TO
DXMO.TO
PPL.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO) and Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPL.TO | DXMO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 2.65 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | 8.15 | -0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPL.TO | DXMO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 1.92 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 1.17 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
PPL.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPL.TO drawdown since its inception was -68.48%, which is greater than DXMO.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPL.TO and DXMO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPL.TO | DXMO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.48% | -26.12% | -42.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.82% | -26.12% | +13.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -9.84% | +9.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.73% | -5.78% | -2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.43% | 8.46% | -3.03% |
Volatility
PPL.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO) is 7.13%, while Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that PPL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXMO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPL.TO | DXMO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 13.29% | -6.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.40% | 29.39% | -15.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.91% | 36.04% | -17.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 34.39% | -15.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.84% | 34.39% | -3.55% |
Dividends
PPL.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Dividend Comparison
PPL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than DXMO.TO's 0.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXMO.TO Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF | 0.16% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PPL.TO Pembina Pipeline Corporation | 4.15% | 5.39% | 7.09% | 7.93% | 6.97% | 10.89% | 13.89% | 4.90% | 5.53% | 4.48% | 4.53% | 5.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPL.TO and DXMO.TO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PPL.TO and DXMO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer