PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXMO.TO vs. PICK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXMO.TO vs. PICK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DXMO.TO is traded in CAD, while PICK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PICK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXMO.TO achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 32.24% return.


DXMO.TO

1D
-2.82%
1M
7.64%
YTD
11.64%
6M
21.16%
1Y
68.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PICK

1D
-2.34%
1M
13.49%
YTD
32.24%
6M
38.31%
1Y
90.55%
3Y*
24.35%
5Y*
14.98%
10Y*
18.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXMO.TO vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DXMO.TO
Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF
11.64%88.43%-9.23%
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF
32.24%44.93%-10.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DXMO.TO and PICK is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2024

0.49

The correlation between DXMO.TO and PICK shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXMO.TO vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXMO.TO
DXMO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DXMO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXMO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXMO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DXMO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXMO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

PICK
PICK Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PICK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PICK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PICK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PICK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PICK Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXMO.TO vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXMO.TOPICKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.54

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

4.72

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.17

20.03

-11.86

DXMO.TO vs. PICK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXMO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the PICK Sharpe Ratio of 3.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXMO.TO and PICK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXMO.TOPICKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

3.40

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.34

+0.84

Drawdowns

DXMO.TO vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXMO.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, smaller than the maximum PICK drawdown of -55.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXMO.TO and PICK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXMO.TOPICKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.12%

-55.30%

+29.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.12%

-19.28%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.81%

-2.34%

-7.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.77%

-15.88%

+10.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.44%

4.54%

+3.90%

Volatility

DXMO.TO vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison

Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.29% compared to iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) at 10.91%. This indicates that DXMO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXMO.TOPICKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.29%

10.91%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.44%

23.10%

+6.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.05%

26.76%

+9.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.42%

24.73%

+9.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.42%

25.38%

+9.04%

DXMO.TO vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXMO.TO has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXMO.TO vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison

DXMO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than PICK's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXMO.TO
Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF
0.16%0.18%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF
2.20%2.88%3.26%4.19%6.93%5.89%2.27%5.51%4.77%2.41%1.15%15.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


DXMO.TO and PICK have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PICK is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PICK is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for DXMO.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Dynamic and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for DXMO.TO and 0.39% for PICK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXMO.TO and PICK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer