DXMO.TO vs. PICK
Compare and contrast key facts about Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK).
DXMO.TO and PICK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DXMO.TO is an actively managed fund by Dynamic. It was launched on Jul 2, 2024. PICK is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012.
Performance
DXMO.TO vs. PICK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DXMO.TO vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DXMO.TO Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF | 3.52% | 88.43% | -9.23% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 11.72% | 44.93% | -10.98% |
Different Trading Currencies
DXMO.TO is traded in CAD, while PICK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PICK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXMO.TO achieves a 3.52% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 11.72% return.
DXMO.TO
- 1D
- 6.73%
- 1M
- -15.48%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 16.91%
- 1Y
- 70.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PICK
- 1D
- 4.82%
- 1M
- -10.31%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 29.07%
- 1Y
- 57.83%
- 3Y*
- 14.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 16.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DXMO.TO vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXMO.TO has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DXMO.TO vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank
DXMO.TO
PICK
DXMO.TO vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DXMO.TO | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 2.10 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | 2.59 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 2.92 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.08 | 11.47 | -1.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DXMO.TO | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.10 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.29 | +0.86 |
Correlation
The correlation between DXMO.TO and PICK is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DXMO.TO vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison
DXMO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than PICK's 2.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXMO.TO Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.61% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
Drawdowns
DXMO.TO vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXMO.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, smaller than the maximum PICK drawdown of -55.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXMO.TO and PICK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXMO.TO | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -68.87% | +42.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.12% | -19.54% | -6.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.37% | -12.15% | -4.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -24.37% | +19.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.03% | 4.87% | +2.16% |
Volatility
DXMO.TO vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison
Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.47% compared to iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) at 12.87%. This indicates that DXMO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DXMO.TO | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.47% | 12.87% | +3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.33% | 21.08% | +9.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.47% | 27.70% | +8.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.02% | 24.36% | +9.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.02% | 25.36% | +8.66% |