PPI vs. TSLQ

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

PPI (Astoria Real Assets ETF) and TSLQ (Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPI is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by AXS, while TSLQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PPI returned 18.90%/yr vs -61.93%/yr for TSLQ. Their -0.38 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PPI charges 0.58%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for TSLQ.

Performance

PPI vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPI achieves a 15.76% return, which is significantly lower than TSLQ's 34.36% return.

PPI

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 1.48%
• 6M: 7.16%
• YTD: 15.76%
• 1Y: 27.12%
• 3Y*: 18.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.41%

TSLQ

• 1D: -3.29%
• 1M: 30.62%
• 6M: 21.88%
• YTD: 34.36%
• 1Y: -49.26%
• 3Y*: -61.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -55.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF	$458.77K	$622.77K	$642.93K
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF	$163.26M	$138.92M	$160.02M

PPI vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF	15.76%	30.05%	6.43%	11.33%	13.62%
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF	34.36%	-74.67%	-83.21%	-59.97%	61.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PPI and TSLQ is -0.45, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.45
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	-0.38

Return for Risk

PPI vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PPI

PPI Risk / Return Rank: 64
PPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
PPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
PPI Omega Ratio Rank: 56
PPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
PPI Martin Ratio Rank: 63

TSLQ

TSLQ Risk / Return Rank: 5
TSLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
TSLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
TSLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6
TSLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
TSLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PPI vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PPI	TSLQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	-0.53	+2.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	-0.39	+2.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	0.96	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	-0.73	+4.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.54	-0.91	+9.44

PPI vs. TSLQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the TSLQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPI and TSLQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PPI vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPI drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPI and TSLQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PPI	TSLQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.54%	-98.73%	+74.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.98%	-68.10%	+60.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.70%	-97.85%	+77.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.90%	-98.00%	+94.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.43%	-68.48%	+62.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	54.39%	-51.20%

Volatility

PPI vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) is 4.24%, while Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a volatility of 32.45%. This indicates that PPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PPI	TSLQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	32.45%	-28.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.33%	67.35%	-55.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.71%	92.67%	-75.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.94%	95.62%	-76.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.94%	95.62%	-76.68%

PPI vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLQ's 1.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

PPI vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison

PPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than TSLQ's 7.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF	1.30%	1.06%	0.60%	2.87%	2.40%
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF	7.86%	10.56%	4.95%	13.35%	2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PPI and TSLQ in my portfolio?

PPI and TSLQ have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PPI or TSLQ?

TSLQ has higher volatility (32.45%) compared to PPI (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPI dropped -24.54% vs TSLQ's -98.73%.

Which ETF is better, PPI or TSLQ?

On 3-year performance, PPI leads with 18.90% vs -61.93% for TSLQ. On fees, PPI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PPI has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PPI or TSLQ?

Over the 3-year period, PPI has performed better with a 18.90% return vs -61.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PPI or TSLQ?

PPI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for TSLQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PPI or TSLQ?

TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 7.86%, compared with 1.30% for PPI.

What is the main difference between PPI and TSLQ?

PPI is categorized as Global Allocation, while TSLQ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPI and 1.17% for TSLQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.