PPI vs. TFPN

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

PPI (Astoria Real Assets ETF) and TFPN (Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PPI returned 18.90%/yr vs 6.33%/yr for TFPN. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PPI charges 0.58%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for TFPN.

Performance

PPI vs. TFPN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) and Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PPI having a 15.76% return and TFPN slightly higher at 16.08%.

PPI

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 1.48%
• 6M: 7.16%
• YTD: 15.76%
• 1Y: 27.12%
• 3Y*: 18.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.41%

TFPN

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -1.95%
• 6M: 5.41%
• YTD: 16.08%
• 1Y: 28.59%
• 3Y*: 6.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF	$458.77K	$622.77K	$642.93K
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF	$383.41K	$561.56K	$362.71K

PPI vs. TFPN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF	15.76%	30.05%	6.43%	7.48%
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF	16.08%	3.61%	2.67%	-1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PPI and TFPN is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023	0.46

The correlation between PPI and TFPN shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PPI vs. TFPN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PPI

PPI Risk / Return Rank: 64
PPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
PPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
PPI Omega Ratio Rank: 56
PPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
PPI Martin Ratio Rank: 63

TFPN

TFPN Risk / Return Rank: 65
TFPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
TFPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
TFPN Omega Ratio Rank: 65
TFPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
TFPN Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PPI vs. TFPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) and Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PPI	TFPN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.77	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	2.37	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.31	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	2.63	+0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.54	8.56	-0.03

PPI vs. TFPN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the TFPN Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPI and TFPN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PPI vs. TFPN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPI drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, which is greater than TFPN's maximum drawdown of -16.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPI and TFPN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PPI	TFPN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.54%	-16.72%	-7.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.98%	-10.94%	+2.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.70%	-16.72%	-3.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.90%	-8.69%	+4.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.43%	-4.92%	-1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	3.35%	-0.16%

Volatility

PPI vs. TFPN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) is 4.24%, while Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that PPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TFPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PPI	TFPN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	6.29%	-2.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.33%	13.72%	-1.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.71%	16.24%	+0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.94%	13.35%	+5.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.94%	13.35%	+5.59%

PPI vs. TFPN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than TFPN's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

PPI vs. TFPN - Dividend Comparison

PPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while TFPN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF	1.30%	1.06%	0.60%	2.87%	2.40%
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.94%	0.98%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PPI and TFPN in my portfolio?

PPI and TFPN have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PPI or TFPN?

TFPN has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to PPI (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPI dropped -24.54% vs TFPN's -16.72%.

Which ETF is better, PPI or TFPN?

On 3-year performance, PPI leads with 18.90% vs 6.33% for TFPN. On fees, PPI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PPI has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PPI or TFPN?

Over the 3-year period, PPI has performed better with a 18.90% return vs 6.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PPI or TFPN?

PPI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for TFPN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PPI or TFPN?

PPI has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for TFPN.

What is the main difference between PPI and TFPN?

They also come from different issuers: AXS and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPI and 1.10% for TFPN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TFPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.