PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPI vs. TFPN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PPI vs. TFPN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF (PPI) and Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PPI vs. TFPN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PPI
AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF
11.99%30.06%-6.85%
TFPN
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF
8.26%3.61%1.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPI achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly higher than TFPN's 8.26% return.


PPI

1D
2.01%
1M
-4.97%
YTD
11.99%
6M
14.13%
1Y
45.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TFPN

1D
0.73%
1M
-5.66%
YTD
8.26%
6M
12.04%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PPI vs. TFPN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPI has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than TFPN's 1.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PPI vs. TFPN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPI
PPI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPI Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

TFPN
TFPN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
TFPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFPN Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TFPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFPN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPI vs. TFPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF (PPI) and Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPITFPNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

1.78

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.86

2.46

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.33

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

3.06

+0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.36

9.20

+6.16

PPI vs. TFPN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPI Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the TFPN Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPI and TFPN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPITFPNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.78

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.22

0.38

+0.83

Correlation

The correlation between PPI and TFPN is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PPI vs. TFPN - Dividend Comparison

PPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while TFPN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
PPI
AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF
1.05%1.06%0.35%0.00%
TFPN
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF
0.00%0.00%0.94%0.98%

Drawdowns

PPI vs. TFPN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPI drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, which is greater than TFPN's maximum drawdown of -16.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPI and TFPN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PPITFPNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.89%

-16.72%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-7.47%

-5.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-6.21%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-5.13%

+2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.49%

+0.49%

Volatility

PPI vs. TFPN - Volatility Comparison

AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF (PPI) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) at 5.30%. This indicates that PPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PPITFPNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

5.30%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.59%

11.21%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.23%

13.40%

+6.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.41%

12.38%

+7.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.41%

12.38%

+7.03%