PPI vs. SARK
PPI (Astoria Real Assets ETF) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPI is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by AXS, while SARK is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PPI returned 22.47%/yr vs -30.74%/yr for SARK. At a correlation of -0.54, they often move in opposite directions. PPI charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.
Performance
PPI vs. SARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPI achieves a 16.52% return, which is significantly higher than SARK's -6.78% return.
PPI
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 16.52%
- 6M
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 38.26%
- 3Y*
- 22.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARK
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- -6.78%
- 6M
- -2.33%
- 1Y
- -33.81%
- 3Y*
- -30.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPI vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF | 16.52% | 30.05% | 6.43% | 11.33% | 4.04% | 0.22% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -6.78% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -46.32% | 83.35% | 0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPI and SARK is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2021 | -0.54 |
The correlation between PPI and SARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.58 to -0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPI vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank
PPI
SARK
PPI vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPI | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 0.86 | +0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.82 | -0.83 | +5.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.72 | -1.11 | +16.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPI | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | -0.95 | +3.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | -0.24 | +1.04 |
Drawdowns
PPI vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPI drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum SARK drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPI and SARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPI | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.54% | -81.07% | +56.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.98% | -40.75% | +32.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.70% | -74.42% | +53.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.26% | -79.42% | +76.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -46.46% | +39.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 30.47% | -28.03% |
Volatility
PPI vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) is 4.37%, while Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that PPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPI | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 9.13% | -4.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | 25.05% | -12.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 35.91% | -20.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 56.24% | -37.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 56.24% | -37.20% |
PPI vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPI vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison
PPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than SARK's 3.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF | 1.01% | 1.06% | 0.60% | 2.87% | 2.40% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.02% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPI and SARK have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SARK has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to PPI (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPI dropped -24.54% vs SARK's -81.07%.
On 3-year performance, PPI leads with 22.47% vs -30.74% for SARK. On fees, PPI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PPI has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PPI has performed better with a 22.47% return vs -30.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PPI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SARK.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 1.01% for PPI.
PPI is categorized as Global Allocation, while SARK is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPI and 0.75% for SARK.
PPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPI and SARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer