PPI vs. RINC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PPI (AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF) and RINC (AXS Real Estate Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPI is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by AXS, while RINC is a REIT fund tracking the Gapstow Real Estate Income Index. PPI is actively managed, while RINC is passively managed. PPI charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RINC.

Performance

PPI vs. RINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF (PPI) and AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PPI

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RINC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPI vs. RINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PPI AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF	-0.59%
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	0.00%

PPI vs. RINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PPI	RINC
Industrials	31.4%	-
Energy	23.1%	-
Utilities	18.7%	-
Real Estate	15.1%	100.0%
Basic Materials	10.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.6%	-
Technology	0.6%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-

Return for Risk

PPI vs. RINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF (PPI) and AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PPI	RINC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-2.74	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PPI	RINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.79%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PPI	RINC	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.05%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.05%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.05%	—	—

PPI vs. RINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPI has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than RINC's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

PPI vs. RINC - Dividend Comparison

PPI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
PPI AXS Astoria Inflation Sensitive ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	2.16%	6.04%	10.85%	3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PPI or RINC?

On fees, PPI is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PPI or RINC?

PPI is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for RINC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PPI or RINC?

RINC has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.00% for PPI.

What is the main difference between PPI and RINC?

PPI is categorized as Global Allocation, while RINC is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for PPI and 0.89% for RINC.